These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25028908)

  • 1. [Introduction to the indirect meta-analyses].
    Bolaños Díaz R; Calderón Cahua M
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2014 Apr; 34(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 25028908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Network meta-analyses: Interest and limits in oncology].
    Ribassin-Majed L; Pignon JP; Michiels S; Blanchard P
    Bull Cancer; 2016 Mar; 103(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 26917469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
    Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
    Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
    Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of national guidelines for network meta-analysis.
    Laws A; Kendall R; Hawkins N
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):642-54. PubMed ID: 25128059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Introduction to traditional meta-analysis].
    Bolaños Díaz R; Calderón Cahua M
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2014; 34(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 24721958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses.
    Song F; Altman DG; Glenny AM; Deeks JJ
    BMJ; 2003 Mar; 326(7387):472. PubMed ID: 12609941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis.
    Cipriani A; Higgins JP; Geddes JR; Salanti G
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Jul; 159(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23856683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness of antibiotics for uncomplicated urinary tract infections: network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Knottnerus BJ; Grigoryan L; Geerlings SE; Moll van Charante EP; Verheij TJ; Kessels AG; ter Riet G
    Fam Pract; 2012 Dec; 29(6):659-70. PubMed ID: 22516128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using indirect comparisons to compare interventions within a Cochrane review: a tool for comparative effectiveness research.
    Agapova M; Devine EB; Nguyen H; Wolf FM; Inoue LY
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jul; 3(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 25275232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction.
    Catalá-López F; Tobías A; Cameron C; Moher D; Hutton B
    Rheumatol Int; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1489-96. PubMed ID: 24691560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2012; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22358214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Indirect comparison and network meta-analyses--new tools for the assessment of evidence on the relative efficacy of drugs].
    Peura P; Asseburg C; Turunen J; Purmonen T; Martikainen J
    Duodecim; 2011; 127(9):900-10. PubMed ID: 21648163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons.
    König J; Krahn U; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5414-29. PubMed ID: 24123165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions.
    Song F; Harvey I; Lilford R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):455-63. PubMed ID: 18394538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses.
    Mbuagbaw L; Rochwerg B; Jaeschke R; Heels-Andsell D; Alhazzani W; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):79. PubMed ID: 28403893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.
    da Costa BR; Juni P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Dec; 35(47):3336-45. PubMed ID: 25416325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical trials with new oral anticoagulants. Additive value of indirect comparisons also named network meta-analyses.
    Harenberg J; Weiss C
    Hamostaseologie; 2013; 33(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 23344716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.