These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25028908)

  • 21. Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.
    Roever L; Biondi-Zoccai G
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 106(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 27142793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis.
    Hartling L; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Jun; 9(2):486-94. PubMed ID: 25404611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extending Treatment Networks in Health Technology Assessment: How Far Should We Go?
    Caldwell DM; Dias S; Welton NJ
    Value Health; 2015 Jul; 18(5):673-81. PubMed ID: 26297096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Antiretroviral therapy for initial human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS treatment: critical appraisal of the evidence from over 100 randomized trials and 400 systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Kanters S; Mills EJ; Thorlund K; Bucher HC; Ioannidis JP
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 24274661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Appropriate use of information in therapeutic decision-making: reflections on indirect comparisons.
    Belsey JD
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2015 Feb; 31(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 25586170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research.
    Signorovitch JE; Sikirica V; Erder MH; Xie J; Lu M; Hodgkins PS; Betts KA; Wu EQ
    Value Health; 2012; 15(6):940-7. PubMed ID: 22999145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Development of an Excel spreadsheet for meta-analysis of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons].
    Tobías A; Catalá-López F; Roqué M
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 24728389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
    LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Informing treatment decisions through meta-analysis: to network or not?
    Al Wattar BH; Zamora J; Khan KS
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Mar; 22(1):12-15. PubMed ID: 27986815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Graphical exploration of network meta-analysis data: the use of multidimensional scaling.
    Chung H; Lumley T
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 18697844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A review of evidence-based medicine and meta-analytic reviews in migraine.
    Tfelt-Hansen P
    Cephalalgia; 2006 Nov; 26(11):1265-74. PubMed ID: 17059433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Linear mixed model approach to network meta-analysis for continuous outcomes in periodontal research.
    Tu YK
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 25581572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is the allegiance effect an epiphenomenon of true efficacy differences between treatments? a meta-analysis.
    Munder T; Flückiger C; Gerger H; Wampold BE; Barth J
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Oct; 59(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 22946981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing comparative effectiveness of new drugs before approval using prospective network meta-analyses.
    Naci H; O'Connor AB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):812-6. PubMed ID: 23810022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency of treatment-effect modification affecting indirect comparisons: a systematic review.
    Coory M; Jordan S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(9):723-32. PubMed ID: 20545383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: direct and indirect treatment comparisons.
    Buti J; Glenny AM; Worthington HV; Nieri M; Baccini M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 21594220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis.
    Thorlund K; Mills EJ
    Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; 1():41. PubMed ID: 22992327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiply adjusted comparisons: A meta-analysis method to compare single-arm clinical-trial data to literature results regarding a competitor.
    Boethig D; Hecker H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):644-669. PubMed ID: 29027509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What is a multiple treatments meta-analysis?
    Cipriani A; Barbui C; Rizzo C; Salanti G
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2012 Jun; 21(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 22789162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [About meta-analyses].
    Tognoni G
    Assist Inferm Ric; 2018; 37(1):47-49. PubMed ID: 29658540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.