These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25028989)

  • 21. Freeing the visual channel by exploiting vibrotactile BCI feedback.
    Leeb R; Gwak K; Kim DS; del R Millán J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3093-6. PubMed ID: 24110382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Saccades to somatosensory targets. III. eye-position-dependent somatosensory activity in primate superior colliculus.
    Groh JM; Sparks DL
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jan; 75(1):439-53. PubMed ID: 8822569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Dec; 19(6):677-85. PubMed ID: 21984521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex.
    Hughes CL; Flesher SN; Weiss JM; Boninger M; Collinger JL; Gaunt RA
    Elife; 2021 Jul; 10():. PubMed ID: 34313221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time.
    Forster B; Cavina-Pratesi C; Aglioti SM; Berlucchi G
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):480-7. PubMed ID: 11914794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optic flow improves adaptability of spatiotemporal characteristics during split-belt locomotor adaptation with tactile stimulation.
    Eikema DJ; Chien JH; Stergiou N; Myers SA; Scott-Pandorf MM; Bloomberg JJ; Mukherjee M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):511-22. PubMed ID: 26525712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychophysical Evaluation of Proprioceptive Feedback Through a Probe Sliding on the Forearm Skin of Healthy Humans.
    Devecioğlu İ
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 50(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 35581510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High frequency sensory stimulation improves tactile but not motor performance in older adults.
    Voelcker-Rehage C; Godde B
    Motor Control; 2010 Oct; 14(4):460-77. PubMed ID: 21051788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Virtual active touch using randomly patterned intracortical microstimulation.
    O'Doherty JE; Lebedev MA; Li Z; Nicolelis MA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jan; 20(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 22207642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination: Using a short auditory contact cue.
    Rand MK
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 717():134695. PubMed ID: 31846732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task-relevance and temporal synchrony between tactile and visual stimuli modulates cortical activity and motor performance during sensory-guided movement.
    Meehan SK; Staines WR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Feb; 30(2):484-96. PubMed ID: 18095277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect.
    Zhao K; Hu L; Qu F; Cui Q; Piao Q; Xu H; Li Y; Wang L; Fu X
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2283-92. PubMed ID: 27038203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses.
    Dechaux A; Haytam-Mahsoub M; Kitazaki M; Lagarde J; Ganesh G
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20253. PubMed ID: 36424417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modulation of somatosensory event-related potential components in a tactile-visual cross-modal task.
    Ohara S; Lenz FA; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006; 138(4):1387-95. PubMed ID: 16442738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing vibrotactile feedback strategies by controlling a cursor with unstable dynamics.
    Quick KM; Card NS; Whaite SM; Mischel J; Loughlin P; Batista AP
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2589-92. PubMed ID: 25570520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression.
    Juravle G; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 213(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 21717097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychophysical correspondence between vibrotactile intensity and intracortical microstimulation for tactile neuroprostheses in rats.
    Devecioğlu İ; Güçlü B
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Feb; 14(1):016010. PubMed ID: 27991426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement.
    Juravle G; Heed T; Spence C; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1293-305. PubMed ID: 26914480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.