104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25029379)
1. Prostate cancer grading: use of graph cut and spatial arrangement of nuclei.
Nguyen K; Sarkar A; Jain AK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2254-70. PubMed ID: 25029379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structure and context in prostatic gland segmentation and classification.
Nguyen K; Sarkar A; Jain AK
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):115-23. PubMed ID: 23285542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmentation of cytoplasm and nuclei of abnormal cells in cervical cytology using global and local graph cuts.
Zhang L; Kong H; Chin CT; Liu S; Chen Z; Wang T; Chen S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Jul; 38(5):369-80. PubMed ID: 24646890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic segmentation of cell nuclei in Feulgen-stained histological sections of prostate cancer and quantitative evaluation of segmentation results.
Nielsen B; Albregtsen F; Danielsen HE
Cytometry A; 2012 Jul; 81(7):588-601. PubMed ID: 22605528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Color graphs for automated cancer diagnosis and grading.
Altunbay D; Cigir C; Sokmensuer C; Gunduz-Demir C
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):665-74. PubMed ID: 19846369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visually Meaningful Histopathological Features for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer.
Niazi MKK; Keluo Yao ; Zynger DL; Clinton SK; Chen J; Koyuturk M; LaFramboise T; Gurcan M
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Jul; 21(4):1027-1038. PubMed ID: 28113734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of histological images.
Tabesh A; Teverovskiy M; Pang HY; Kumar VP; Verbel D; Kotsianti A; Saidi O
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1366-78. PubMed ID: 17948727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer aided analysis of prostate histopathology images Gleason grading especially for Gleason score 7.
Ren J; Sadimin ET; Wang D; Epstein JI; Foran DJ; Qi X
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():3013-6. PubMed ID: 26736926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
Zhao J; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided prognosis: predicting patient and disease outcome via quantitative fusion of multi-scale, multi-modal data.
Madabhushi A; Agner S; Basavanhally A; Doyle S; Lee G
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011; 35(7-8):506-14. PubMed ID: 21333490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate.
Jafari-Khouzani K; Soltanian-Zadeh H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 12814236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Web-based tissue microarray image data analysis: initial validation testing through prostate cancer Gleason grading.
Bova GS; Parmigiani G; Epstein JI; Wheeler T; Mucci NR; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 11331959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Objective grading of prostate carcinoma based on fractal dimensions: Gleason 3 + 4= 7a ≠Gleason 4 + 3 =7b].
Waliszewski P; Wagenlehner F; Kribus S; Schafhauser W; Weidner W; Gattenlöhner S
Urologe A; 2014 Oct; 53(10):1504-11. PubMed ID: 25015793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multimodal sparse representation-based classification for lung needle biopsy images.
Shi Y; Gao Y; Yang Y; Zhang Y; Wang D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2675-85. PubMed ID: 23674412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New prospective for non-invasive detection, grading, size evaluation, and tumor location of prostate cancer.
Cortesi M; Fridman E; Volkov A; Shilstein SSh; Chechik R; Breskin A; Vartsky D; Raviv G; Ramon J
Prostate; 2010 Nov; 70(15):1701-8. PubMed ID: 20564321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor Malignancy Detection Using Histopathology Imaging.
Kurmi Y; Chaurasia V; Ganesh N
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Dec; 50(4):514-528. PubMed ID: 31501064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated Region-based Prostate Cancer Cell Nuclei Localization. Part of a Prognostic Modality Tool for Prostate Cancer Patients.
Zarei N; Bakhtiari A; Korbelik J; Carraro A; Keyes M; Guillaud M; MacAulay C
Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol; 2016 Apr; 38(2):59-69. PubMed ID: 27386626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ability to predict biochemical progression using Gleason score and a computer-generated quantitative nuclear grade derived from cancer cell nuclei.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Partin AW; Coffey DS; Epstein JI
Urology; 1996 Nov; 48(5):685-91. PubMed ID: 8911509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foamy gland adenocarcinoma of the prostate: incidence, Gleason grade, and early clinical outcome.
Hudson J; Cao D; Vollmer R; Kibel AS; Grewal S; Humphrey PA
Hum Pathol; 2012 Jul; 43(7):974-9. PubMed ID: 22221706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
