These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25031307)

  • 1. Evolution of breast cancer screening in the Medicare population: clinical and economic implications.
    Killelea BK; Long JB; Chagpar AB; Ma X; Wang R; Ross JS; Gross CP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Aug; 106(8):. PubMed ID: 25031307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
    Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cost of breast cancer screening in the Medicare population.
    Gross CP; Long JB; Ross JS; Abu-Khalaf MM; Wang R; Killelea BK; Gold HT; Chagpar AB; Ma X
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Feb; 173(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23303200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Downstream Breast Imaging Following Screening Mammography in Medicare Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
    Sadigh G; Duszak R; Ward KC; Jiang R; Switchenko JM; Applegate KE; Carlos RC
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Mar; 33(3):284-290. PubMed ID: 29139055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
    Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
    Feig S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(15):1-71. PubMed ID: 27468326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates?
    Braithwaite D; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller B; Dittus K; Moore D; Wernli KJ; Mandelblatt J; Kerlikowske K;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 23385442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
    Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher mammography screening costs without appreciable clinical benefit: the case of digital mammography.
    Kerlikowske K; Hubbard R; Tosteson AN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Aug; 106(8):. PubMed ID: 25031310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast screening in north India: a cost-effective cancer prevention strategy.
    Pandey S; Chandravati
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(2):853-7. PubMed ID: 23621251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study.
    Yeh JM; Lowry KP; Schechter CB; Diller LR; Alagoz O; Armstrong GT; Hampton JM; Leisenring W; Liu Q; Mandelblatt JS; Miglioretti DL; Moskowitz CS; Oeffinger KC; Trentham-Dietz A; Stout NK
    Ann Intern Med; 2020 Sep; 173(5):331-341. PubMed ID: 32628531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.
    Duffy SW; Mackay J; Thomas S; Anderson E; Chen TH; Ellis I; Evans G; Fielder H; Fox R; Gui G; Macmillan D; Moss S; Rogers C; Sibbering M; Wallis M; Warren R; Watson E; Whynes D; Allgood P; Caunt J
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(11):vii-xiv, 1-95. PubMed ID: 23489892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided detection in mammography: downstream effect on diagnostic testing, ductal carcinoma in situ treatment, and costs.
    Fenton JJ; Lee CI; Xing G; Baldwin LM; Elmore JG
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 174(12):2032-4. PubMed ID: 25347134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.