114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25031558)
1. Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches?
Glanville JM; Duffy S; McCool R; Varley D
J Med Libr Assoc; 2014 Jul; 102(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 25031558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study.
Banno M; Tsujimoto Y; Kataoka Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):200. PubMed ID: 32711471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.
Royle P; Waugh N
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jul; 5():23. PubMed ID: 16042789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Both clinical trial register and electronic bibliographic database searches were needed to identify randomized clinical trials for systematic reviews: an evaluation study.
Kaul T; Colombijn JMT; Vernooij RWM; Spijker R; Idema DL; Huis In 't Veld LF; Damen JAA; Hooft L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 May; 169():111300. PubMed ID: 38402998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study.
Sampson M; Barrowman NJ; Moher D; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Morrison A; Klassen TP; Zhang L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():7. PubMed ID: 16504110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does information from ClinicalTrials.gov increase transparency and reduce bias? Results from a five-report case series.
Adam GP; Springs S; Trikalinos T; Williams JW; Eaton JL; Von Isenburg M; Gierisch JM; Wilson LM; Robinson KA; Viswanathan M; Middleton JC; Forman-Hoffman VL; Berliner E; Kaplan RM
Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):59. PubMed ID: 29661214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency.
Bethel AC; Rogers M; Abbott R
J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 33424470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
Relevo R
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. PubMed ID: 22648672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.
Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Index of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine industry clinical study programmes and non-industry funded studies: a necessary basis to address reporting bias in a systematic review.
Jørgensen L; Gøtzsche PC; Jefferson T
Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 29347995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry.
Borah R; Brown AW; Capers PL; Kaiser KA
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e012545. PubMed ID: 28242767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates.
Surian D; Dunn AG; Orenstein L; Bashir R; Coiera E; Bourgeois FT
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Mar; 79():32-40. PubMed ID: 29410356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data.
Golder S; Loke YK
J Med Libr Assoc; 2012 Apr; 100(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 22514510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Searching ClinicalTrials.gov did not change the conclusions of a systematic review.
Wilson LM; Sharma R; Dy SM; Waldfogel JM; Robinson KA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():127-135. PubMed ID: 28757261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic?
Stansfield C; Dickson K; Bangpan M
Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):191. PubMed ID: 27846867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.
Waffenschmidt S; Knelangen M; Sieben W; Bühn S; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):132. PubMed ID: 31253092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review.
Aromataris E; Riitano D
Am J Nurs; 2014 May; 114(5):49-56. PubMed ID: 24759479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A study of search strategy availability statements and sharing practices for systematic reviews: Ask and you might receive.
Neilson CJ; Premji Z
Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):441-449. PubMed ID: 38098285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence-based practice: extending the search to find material for the systematic review.
Helmer D; Savoie I; Green C; Kazanjian A
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2001 Oct; 89(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 11837256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
