These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25031839)

  • 1. Comparison of three generations of ActiGraph activity monitors under free-living conditions: do they provide comparable assessments of overall physical activity in 9-year old children?
    Grydeland M; Hansen BH; Ried-Larsen M; Kolle E; Anderssen SA
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2014; 6():26. PubMed ID: 25031839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor.
    Ried-Larsen M; Brønd JC; Brage S; Hansen BH; Grydeland M; Andersen LB; Møller NC
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2012 Sep; 9():113. PubMed ID: 22971175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions.
    Vanhelst J; Mikulovic J; Bui-Xuan G; Dieu O; Blondeau T; Fardy P; Béghin L
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Apr; 5():187. PubMed ID: 22534207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of actigraphs uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for assessment of physical activity in adults in laboratory conditions.
    Kelly LA; McMillan DG; Anderson A; Fippinger M; Fillerup G; Rider J
    BMC Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 24279826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three generations of ActiGraph™ activity monitors in children and adolescents.
    Robusto KM; Trost SG
    J Sports Sci; 2012; 30(13):1429-35. PubMed ID: 22857599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.
    Sasaki JE; John D; Freedson PS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2011 Sep; 14(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 21616714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions.
    Kaminsky LA; Ozemek C
    Physiol Meas; 2012 Nov; 33(11):1869-76. PubMed ID: 23111061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of the ActiGraph GT1M during walking and cycling.
    Herman Hansen B; Børtnes I; Hildebrand M; Holme I; Kolle E; Anderssen SA
    J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 24117333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of ActiGraph GT3X+ and Actical accelerometer data in 9-11-year-old Canadian children.
    Borghese MM; Tremblay MS; LeBlanc AG; Leduc G; Boyer C; Chaput JP
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Mar; 35(6):517-524. PubMed ID: 27103499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph.
    Hänggi JM; Phillips LR; Rowlands AV
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jan; 16(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22749938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension.
    Cain KL; Conway TL; Adams MA; Husak LE; Sallis JF
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2013 Apr; 10():51. PubMed ID: 23618461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of four ActiGraph accelerometers during walking and running.
    John D; Tyo B; Bassett DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 Feb; 42(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 19927022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accelerometer measured daily physical activity and sedentary pursuits--comparison between two models of the Actigraph and the importance of data reduction.
    Tanha T; Tornberg Å; Dencker M; Wollmer P
    BMC Res Notes; 2013 Oct; 6():439. PubMed ID: 24176143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions.
    Aadland E; Ylvisåker E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134606. PubMed ID: 26274586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
    Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments.
    Feito Y; Garner HR; Bassett DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 24870583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing physical activity estimates in children from hip-worn Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers using raw and counts based processing methods.
    Buchan DS; McLellan G
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Apr; 37(7):779-787. PubMed ID: 30311839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers.
    Rothney MP; Apker GA; Song Y; Chen KY
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Oct; 105(4):1091-7. PubMed ID: 18635874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two Actigraph models for assessing free-living physical activity in Indian adolescents.
    Corder K; Brage S; Ramachandran A; Snehalatha C; Wareham N; Ekelund U
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Dec; 25(14):1607-11. PubMed ID: 17852668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Free-living cross-comparison of two wearable monitors for sleep and physical activity in healthy young adults.
    Cellini N; McDevitt EA; Mednick SC; Buman MP
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Apr; 157():79-86. PubMed ID: 26821185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.