BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25032950)

  • 1. Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
    Jordan TR; Sheen M; Abedipour L; Paterson KB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e98273. PubMed ID: 25032950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.
    Jordan TR; Fuggetta G; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23957. PubMed ID: 21935368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 19246332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.
    Almabruk AA; Paterson KB; McGowan V; Jordan TR
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18131. PubMed ID: 21559084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemiface contributions to hemispheric dominance in visual speech perception.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Nov; 21(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17983286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: a factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception.
    Brysbaert M
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 14967210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: the evidence from Arabic.
    Jordan TR; Almabruk AA; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    Cortex; 2011 Sep; 47(8):992-7. PubMed ID: 21457952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid categorization of foveal and extrafoveal natural images: associated ERPs and effects of lateralization.
    Fize D; Fabre-Thorpe M; Richard G; Doyon B; Thorpe SJ
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Nov; 59(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 16098651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Extrafoveal Vision in Source Code Comprehension.
    Orlov PA; Bednarik R
    Perception; 2017 May; 46(5):541-565. PubMed ID: 27815550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
    McCormick SF; Davis CJ; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do the regions of the visual field contribute to object search in real-world scenes? Evidence from eye movements.
    Nuthmann A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):342-60. PubMed ID: 23937216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.
    Sugishita M; Hamilton CR; Sakuma I; Hemmi I
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Apr; 32(4):399-415. PubMed ID: 8047248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The mechanisms underlying the interhemispheric integration of information in foveal word recognition: evidence for transcortical inhibition.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):81-9. PubMed ID: 20430428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Goal representations dominate superior colliculus activity during extrafoveal tracking.
    Hafed ZM; Krauzlis RJ
    J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(38):9426-39. PubMed ID: 18799675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foveal input is not required for perception of crowd facial expression.
    Wolfe BA; Kosovicheva AA; Leib AY; Wood K; Whitney D
    J Vis; 2015; 15(4):11. PubMed ID: 26360155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.