199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25034097)
1. The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor in patients with resectable gastric cancer.
Takeno S; Hashimoto T; Shibata R; Maki K; Shiwaku H; Yamana I; Yamashita R; Yamashita Y
Oncology; 2014; 87(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 25034097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement of high-sensitivity inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score by gastrectomy is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer.
Takeno S; Hashimoto T; Shibata R; Maki K; Shiwaku H; Yamana I; Yamashita R; Yamashita Y
Anticancer Res; 2014 Oct; 34(10):5695-702. PubMed ID: 25275076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Predictive and Prognostic significance of high-sensitivity modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (HS-mGPS) in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy].
Cui Y; Li J; Cao YH; Liu MY; Shi ZX; Gao TH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 39(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 28316218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Glasgow prognostic score is a useful predictive factor of outcome after palliative gastrectomy for stage IV gastric cancer.
Mimatsu K; Oida T; Fukino N; Kano H; Kawasaki A; Kida K; Kuboi Y; Amano S
Anticancer Res; 2014 Jun; 34(6):3131-6. PubMed ID: 24922683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with vulvar cancer.
Hefler-Frischmuth K; Seebacher V; Polterauer S; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A; Hefler L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Mar; 149(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 20080329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in elderly patients with gastric cancer.
Hirashima K; Watanabe M; Shigaki H; Imamura Y; Ida S; Iwatsuki M; Ishimoto T; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Baba H
J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):1040-6. PubMed ID: 23821018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The preoperative sensitive-modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score in predicting long-term survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Tian R; Zhang F; Sun P; Wu J; Yan H; Wu AR; Zhang M; Jiang YL; Lu YH; Xu QY; Zhan XH; Zhang RX; Qian LT; He J
Oncotarget; 2016 Oct; 7(41):67485-67494. PubMed ID: 27528228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer.
Jeong JH; Lim SM; Yun JY; Rhee GW; Lim JY; Cho JY; Kim YR
Oncology; 2012; 83(5):292-9. PubMed ID: 22964877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic impact of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
Osugi J; Muto S; Matsumura Y; Higuchi M; Suzuki H; Gotoh M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(2):945-51. PubMed ID: 27461679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
La Torre M; Nigri G; Cavallini M; Mercantini P; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):2917-23. PubMed ID: 22488099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of inflammation-based prognostic score on mortality of patients undergoing chemotherapy for far advanced or recurrent unresectable colorectal cancer.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Kubota K
Ann Surg; 2009 Aug; 250(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 19638907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) Is superior to the mGPS in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Chen P; Fang M; Wan Q; Zhang X; Song T; Wu S
Oncotarget; 2017 Nov; 8(59):99861-99870. PubMed ID: 29245945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score in predicting the survival of patients with a soft-tissue sarcoma.
Nakamura T; Matsumine A; Asanuma K; Matsubara T; Sudo A
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):847-52. PubMed ID: 26033068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of a systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing multimodality therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Inoue Y; Iwata T; Okugawa Y; Kawamoto A; Hiro J; Toiyama Y; Tanaka K; Uchida K; Mohri Y; Miki C; Kusunoki M
Oncology; 2013; 84(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 23147449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) have a prognostic role in esophageal cancer?
Walsh SM; Casey S; Kennedy R; Ravi N; Reynolds JV
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 113(7):732-7. PubMed ID: 27004839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical utility of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.
Nakayama M; Tabuchi K; Hara A
Head Neck; 2015 Dec; 37(12):1745-9. PubMed ID: 24989115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients with operable and inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.
Fan H; Shao ZY; Xiao YY; Xie ZH; Chen W; Xie H; Qin GY; Zhao NQ
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 142(6):1285-97. PubMed ID: 26864695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic Significance of the Preoperative Ratio of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Shibutani M; Maeda K; Nagahara H; Iseki Y; Ikeya T; Hirakawa K
Anticancer Res; 2016 Mar; 36(3):995-1001. PubMed ID: 26976989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pretreatment Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Clinical Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Kishi T; Matsuo Y; Ueki N; Iizuka Y; Nakamura A; Sakanaka K; Mizowaki T; Hiraoka M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(3):619-26. PubMed ID: 26068494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the prognostic value of tumour and patient related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of gastric cancer.
Dutta S; Crumley AB; Fullarton GM; Horgan PG; McMillan DC
Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 22444831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
