These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25034198)

  • 1. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
    Colquhoun HL; Levac D; O'Brien KK; Straus S; Tricco AC; Perrier L; Kastner M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1291-4. PubMed ID: 25034198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
    Pham MT; Rajić A; Greig JD; Sargeant JM; Papadopoulos A; McEwen SA
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):371-85. PubMed ID: 26052958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews.
    Colquhoun HL; Jesus TS; O'Brien KK; Tricco AC; Chui A; Zarin W; Lillie E; Hitzig SL; Straus S
    Clin Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 31(9):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 28118743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
    Daudt HM; van Mossel C; Scott SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():48. PubMed ID: 23522333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps.
    O'Brien KK; Colquhoun H; Levac D; Baxter L; Tricco AC; Straus S; Wickerson L; Nayar A; Moher D; O'Malley L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():305. PubMed ID: 27461419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.
    Khalil H; Peters M; Godfrey CM; McInerney P; Soares CB; Parker D
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Apr; 13(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 26821833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Colquhoun H; Garritty CM; Hempel S; Horsley T; Langlois EV; Lillie E; O'Brien KK; Tunçalp Ӧ; Wilson MG; Zarin W; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2021 Oct; 10(1):263. PubMed ID: 34625095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.
    Iannizzi C; Akl EA; Kahale LA; Dorando E; Mosunmola Aminat A; Barker JM; McKenzie JE; Haddaway NR; Piechotta V; Skoetz N
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():802. PubMed ID: 35186269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
    Levac D; Colquhoun H; O'Brien KK
    Implement Sci; 2010 Sep; 5():69. PubMed ID: 20854677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods.
    Lockwood C; Dos Santos KB; Pap R
    Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2019 Dec; 13(5):287-294. PubMed ID: 31756513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From Arksey and O'Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology.
    Westphaln KK; Regoeczi W; Masotya M; Vazquez-Westphaln B; Lounsbury K; McDavid L; Lee H; Johnson J; Ronis SD
    MethodsX; 2021; 8():101375. PubMed ID: 34430271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and map treatments for dysphagia following moderate to severe acquired brain injury.
    Eskildsen SJ; Jakobsen D; Riberholt CG; Poulsen I; Curtis DJ
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029061. PubMed ID: 31320355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews.
    Martin GP; Jenkins DA; Bull L; Sisk R; Lin L; Hulme W; Wilson A; Wang W; Barrowman M; Sammut-Powell C; Pate A; Sperrin M; Peek N;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():191-197. PubMed ID: 32726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 33570328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defining clinically important perioperative blood loss and transfusion for the Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine (StEP) collaborative: a protocol for a scoping review.
    Bartoszko J; Vorobeichik L; Jayarajah M; Karkouti K; Klein AA; Lamy A; Mazer CD; Murphy M; Richards T; Englesakis M; Myles PS; Wijeysundera DN
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e016743. PubMed ID: 28667227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protocol for a scoping review to map patient engagement in scoping reviews.
    Oravec N; Monnin C; Gregora A; Bjorklund B; Dave MG; Schultz ASH; Chudyk AM
    Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Jun; 8(1):27. PubMed ID: 35725640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews.
    Hamel C; Michaud A; Thuku M; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Garritty C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():74-85. PubMed ID: 33038541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
    Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities.
    Sager M; Pistone I
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31368185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.