These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25034339)

  • 1. How to not get stuck-negative feedback due to crowding maintains flexibility in ant foraging.
    Czaczkes TJ
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 360():172-180. PubMed ID: 25034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An agent-based model to investigate the roles of attractive and repellent pheromones in ant decision making during foraging.
    Robinson EJ; Ratnieks FL; Holcombe M
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Nov; 255(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 18778716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative feedback enables fast and flexible collective decision-making in ants.
    Grüter C; Schürch R; Czaczkes TJ; Taylor K; Durance T; Jones SM; Ratnieks FL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44501. PubMed ID: 22984518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploration versus exploitation in polydomous ant colonies.
    Cook Z; Franks DW; Robinson EJ
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Apr; 323():49-56. PubMed ID: 23380232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative feedback: ants choose unoccupied over occupied food sources and lay more pheromone to them.
    Wendt S; Kleinhoelting N; Czaczkes TJ
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Feb; 17(163):20190661. PubMed ID: 32093538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative feedback in ants: crowding results in less trail pheromone deposition.
    Czaczkes TJ; Grüter C; Ratnieks FL
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Apr; 10(81):20121009. PubMed ID: 23365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Symmetry breaking in mass-recruiting ants: extent of foraging biases depends on resource quality.
    Price RI; Grüter C; Hughes WO; Evison SE
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2016; 70(11):1813-1820. PubMed ID: 27784955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Private information alone can trigger trapping of ant colonies in local feeding optima.
    Czaczkes TJ; Salmane AK; Klampfleuthner FA; Heinze J
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Mar; 219(Pt 5):744-51. PubMed ID: 26747911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ant foraging on complex trails: route learning and the role of trail pheromones in Lasius niger.
    Czaczkes TJ; Grüter C; Ellis L; Wood E; Ratnieks FL
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Jan; 216(Pt 2):188-97. PubMed ID: 22972897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling shortest path selection of the ant Linepithema humile using psychophysical theory and realistic parameter values.
    von Thienen W; Metzler D; Witte V
    J Theor Biol; 2015 May; 372():168-78. PubMed ID: 25769943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of multiple pheromones in food recruitment by ants.
    Dussutour A; Nicolis SC; Shephard G; Beekman M; Sumpter DJ
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Aug; 212(Pt 15):2337-48. PubMed ID: 19617426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite collective decision-making.
    Czaczkes TJ; Czaczkes B; Iglhaut C; Heinze J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1809):20142723. PubMed ID: 26019155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Balancing organization and flexibility in foraging dynamics.
    Tabone M; Ermentrout B; Doiron B
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 20627107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual rules for trail pattern formation in Argentine ants (Linepithema humile).
    Perna A; Granovskiy B; Garnier S; Nicolis SC; Labédan M; Theraulaz G; Fourcassié V; Sumpter DJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(7):e1002592. PubMed ID: 22829756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Path efficiency of ant foraging trails in an artificial network.
    Vittori K; Talbot G; Gautrais J; Fourcassié V; Araújo AF; Theraulaz G
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Apr; 239(4):507-15. PubMed ID: 16199059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Insect communication: 'no entry' signal in ant foraging.
    Robinson EJ; Jackson DE; Holcombe M; Ratnieks FL
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7067):442. PubMed ID: 16306981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mathematical model of foraging in a dynamic environment by trail-laying Argentine ants.
    Ramsch K; Reid CR; Beekman M; Middendorf M
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Aug; 306():32-45. PubMed ID: 22575583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The regulation of ant colony foraging activity without spatial information.
    Prabhakar B; Dektar KN; Gordon DM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(8):e1002670. PubMed ID: 22927811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ants adjust their pheromone deposition to a changing environment and their probability of making errors.
    Czaczkes TJ; Heinze J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jul; 282(1810):. PubMed ID: 26063845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimality of collective choices: a stochastic approach.
    Nicolis SC; Detrain C; Demolin D; Deneubourg JL
    Bull Math Biol; 2003 Sep; 65(5):795-808. PubMed ID: 12909251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.