231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25034347)
1. Counter-advertising may reduce parent's susceptibility to front-of-package promotions on unhealthy foods.
Dixon H; Scully M; Kelly B; Donovan R; Chapman K; Wakefield M
J Nutr Educ Behav; 2014; 46(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 25034347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can counter-advertising reduce pre-adolescent children's susceptibility to front-of-package promotions on unhealthy foods? Experimental research.
Dixon H; Scully M; Kelly B; Chapman K; Wakefield M
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 116():211-9. PubMed ID: 24612989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parent's responses to nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements on energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods: an experimental study.
Dixon H; Scully M; Wakefield M; Kelly B; Chapman K; Donovan R
Public Health Nutr; 2011 Jun; 14(6):1071-9. PubMed ID: 21306666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of nutrient content claims, sports celebrity endorsements and premium offers on pre-adolescent children's food preferences: experimental research.
Dixon H; Scully M; Niven P; Kelly B; Chapman K; Donovan R; Martin J; Baur LA; Crawford D; Wakefield M
Pediatr Obes; 2014 Apr; 9(2):e47-57. PubMed ID: 23630014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can counter-advertising diminish persuasive effects of conventional and pseudo-healthy unhealthy food product advertising on parents?: an experimental study.
Dixon H; Scully M; Gascoyne C; Wakefield M
BMC Public Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1781. PubMed ID: 33238936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of marketing claims on toddler food products on parents' product preferences, perceptions and purchasing intentions: an online experiment.
Dixon HG; Awoke MA; Scully M; McCann J; Martin J; Morley B; Rhodes A; McAleese A; Schmidtke A
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2024 May; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 38773586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Food marketing with movie character toys: Effects on young children's preferences for unhealthy and healthier fast food meals.
Dixon H; Niven P; Scully M; Wakefield M
Appetite; 2017 Oct; 117():342-350. PubMed ID: 28712977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Healthy or Unhealthy on Sale? A cross-sectional study on the proportion of healthy and unhealthy foods promoted through flyer advertising by supermarkets in the Netherlands.
Ravensbergen EA; Waterlander WE; Kroeze W; Steenhuis IH
BMC Public Health; 2015 May; 15():470. PubMed ID: 25943988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The extent and nature of food promotion directed to children in Australian supermarkets.
Chapman K; Nicholas P; Banovic D; Supramaniam R
Health Promot Int; 2006 Dec; 21(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 16885173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of front-of-pack marketing attributes versus nutrition and health information on parents' food choices.
Georgina Russell C; Burke PF; Waller DS; Wei E
Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():323-338. PubMed ID: 28479408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parents' reactions to unhealthy food
Scully M; Wakefield M; Pettigrew S; Kelly B; Dixon H
Public Health Nutr; 2020 Mar; 23(4):727-737. PubMed ID: 31915086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can counter-advertising protect spectators of elite sport against the influence of unhealthy food and beverage sponsorship? A naturalistic trial.
Dixon H; Scully M; Wakefield M; Kelly B; Pettigrew S; Chapman K; Niederdeppe J
Soc Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 266():113415. PubMed ID: 33126095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of unhealthy food sponsorship vs. pro-health sponsorship models on young adults' food preferences: a randomised controlled trial.
Dixon H; Scully M; Wakefield M; Kelly B; Pettigrew S; Chapman K; Niederdeppe J
BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1399. PubMed ID: 30572864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to: counter-advertising to combat unhealthy food marketing will not be enough. commentary on "can counter-advertising reduce pre-adolescent children's susceptibility to front-of-package promotions on unhealthy foods? Experimental research".
Dixon H; Scully M; Kelly B; Chapman K; Wakefield M
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 116():223-4. PubMed ID: 24997642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nutrition Label Viewing during a Food-Selection Task: Front-of-Package Labels vs Nutrition Facts Labels.
Graham DJ; Heidrick C; Hodgin K
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1636-46. PubMed ID: 25887785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can counter-advertising dilute marketing effects of alcohol sponsorship of elite sport: A field experiment.
Dixon H; Scully M; Niederdeppe J; Brennan E; O'Brien K; Vandenberg B; Pettigrew S; Wakefield M
Addiction; 2023 Dec; 118(12):2360-2373. PubMed ID: 37563764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the moderating effect of children's nutritional knowledge on the relationship between product evaluations and food choice.
Tarabashkina L; Quester P; Crouch R
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Jan; 149():145-52. PubMed ID: 26717561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Food advertising, children's food choices and obesity: interplay of cognitive defences and product evaluation: an experimental study.
Tarabashkina L; Quester P; Crouch R
Int J Obes (Lond); 2016 Apr; 40(4):581-6. PubMed ID: 26582137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ignorance is bliss. How parents of preschool children make sense of front-of-package visuals and claims on food.
Abrams KM; Evans C; Duff BR
Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():20-9. PubMed ID: 25510529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nutrition-related claims on children's cereals: what do they mean to parents and do they influence willingness to buy?
Harris JL; Thompson JM; Schwartz MB; Brownell KD
Public Health Nutr; 2011 Dec; 14(12):2207-12. PubMed ID: 21806872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
