BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25034348)

  • 1. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kallehauge JF; Tanderup K; Duan C; Haack S; Pedersen EM; Lindegaard JC; Fokdal LU; Mohamed SM; Nielsen T
    Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1064-72. PubMed ID: 25034348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-input two-compartment pharmacokinetic model of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Yang JF; Zhao ZH; Zhang Y; Zhao L; Yang LM; Zhang MM; Wang BY; Wang T; Lu BC
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3652-62. PubMed ID: 27053857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of Interstitial Fractional Volume Quantification by Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Porcine Skeletal Muscles.
    Hindel S; Söhner A; Maa M; Sauerwein W; Baba HA; Kramer M; Lüdemann L
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Jan; 52(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 27482651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application in carcinoma of the cervix.
    Donaldson SB; West CM; Davidson SE; Carrington BM; Hutchison G; Jones AP; Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 20187179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of prostate cancer.
    Korporaal JG; van Vulpen M; van den Berg CA; van der Heide UA
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 21610505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Blood Volume Fraction Quantification with 3D Gradient Echo Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Porcine Skeletal Muscle.
    Hindel S; Söhner A; Maaß M; Sauerwein W; Möllmann D; Baba HA; Kramer M; Lüdemann L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170841. PubMed ID: 28141810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI model selection for predicting tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid cancers.
    Paudyal R; Lu Y; Hatzoglou V; Moreira A; Stambuk HE; Oh JH; Cunanan KM; Aramburu Nunez D; Mazaheri Y; Gonen M; Ho A; Fagin JA; Wong RJ; Shaha A; Tuttle RM; Shukla-Dave A
    NMR Biomed; 2020 Jan; 33(1):e4166. PubMed ID: 31680360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-input tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in thoracic malignancies.
    Lee SH; Rimner A; Deasy JO; Hunt MA; Tyagi N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):169-188. PubMed ID: 31602789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Akaike information criterion in DCE-MRI: does it improve the haemodynamic parameter estimates?
    Luypaert R; Ingrisch M; Sourbron S; de Mey J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3609-28. PubMed ID: 22596020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI.
    Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):735-45. PubMed ID: 21384424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data in primary brain tumours: a comparison of Tofts and shutter speed models.
    Inglese M; Ordidge KL; Honeyfield L; Barwick TD; Aboagye EO; Waldman AD; Grech-Sollars M
    Neuroradiology; 2019 Dec; 61(12):1375-1386. PubMed ID: 31392385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling DCE-MRI at low temporal resolution: a case study on rheumatoid arthritis.
    Ledsam JR; Hodgson R; Moots RJ; Sourbron SP
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Dec; 38(6):1554-63. PubMed ID: 23857776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?
    Duan C; Kallehauge JF; Bretthorst GL; Tanderup K; Ackerman JJ; Garbow JR
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 26946317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust estimation of hemo-dynamic parameters in traditional DCE-MRI models.
    Hansen MB; Tietze A; Haack S; Kallehauge J; Mikkelsen IK; Østergaard L; Mouridsen K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209891. PubMed ID: 30605459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of tumor histology to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based physiological estimates.
    Aref M; Chaudhari AR; Bailey KL; Aref S; Wiener EC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1279-93. PubMed ID: 18487033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracer kinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT bladder cancer data: A preliminary comparison to assess the magnitude of water exchange effects.
    Bains LJ; McGrath DM; Naish JH; Cheung S; Watson Y; Taylor MB; Logue JP; Parker GJ; Waterton JC; Buckley DL
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Aug; 64(2):595-603. PubMed ID: 20665802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: model selection, reproducibility, and validation.
    Gaens ME; Backes WH; Rozel S; Lipperts M; Sanders SN; Jaspers K; Cleutjens JP; Sluimer JC; Heeneman S; Daemen MJ; Welten RJ; Daemen JW; Wildberger JE; Kwee RM; Kooi ME
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 23151823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of tracer kinetic parameters in cervical cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as biomarkers in terms of biological relevance, diagnostic performance and inter-center variability.
    Wang X; Li S; Lin X; Lu Y; Mao C; Ye Z; Li X; Koh TS; Liu J; Liu J; Ma X; Cheng J; Ning G; Yan Z; Hou Z
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():958219. PubMed ID: 36324571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: A systematic comparison of different modelling approaches.
    Kåstad Høiskar M; Sæther O; Delange Alsaker M; Røe Redalen K; Winter RM
    Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jan; 29():100548. PubMed ID: 38380153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.