91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25034819)
1. Use of hydrogel breast biopsy tissue markers reduces the need for wire localization.
Blumencranz PW; Ellis D; Barlowe K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3273-7. PubMed ID: 25034819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a hydrogel based breast biopsy marker (HydroMARK®) as an alternative to wire and radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast lesions.
Klein RL; Mook JA; Euhus DM; Rao R; Wynn RT; Eastman AB; Leitch AM
J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 105(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 22095610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound-Guided Segmental Mastectomy and Excisional Biopsy Using Hydrogel-Encapsulated Clip Localization as an Alternative to Wire Localization.
Gentile LF; Himmler A; Shaw CM; Bouton A; Vorhis E; Marshall J; Spiguel LR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3284-9. PubMed ID: 27338745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative 125I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization.
Dryden MJ; Dogan BE; Fox P; Wang C; Black DM; Hunt K; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 27007608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast surgery techniques: preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons.
Burkholder HC; Witherspoon LE; Burns RP; Horn JS; Biderman MD
Am Surg; 2007 Jun; 73(6):574-8; discussion 578-9. PubMed ID: 17658094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid Implementation of Intraoperative Ultrasonography to Reduce Wire Localization in The Permanente Medical Group.
Chang S; Brooke M; Cureton E; Yeh A; Chen R; Mazzetti-Barros N; Rahbari R; Butler S; Hill N; Shim V
Perm J; 2019; 23():. PubMed ID: 31314730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Localizing high-risk lesions for excisional breast biopsy: a comparison between radioactive seed localization and wire localization.
Diego EJ; Soran A; McGuire KP; Costellic C; Johnson RR; Bonaventura M; Ahrendt GM; McAuliffe PF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3268-72. PubMed ID: 25034818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes.
Sharek D; Zuley ML; Zhang JY; Soran A; Ahrendt GM; Ganott MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):872-7. PubMed ID: 25794081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year experience with hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy.
Arentz C; Baxter K; Boneti C; Henry-Tillman R; Westbrook K; Korourian S; Klimberg VS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():378-83. PubMed ID: 20853061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the dislocation and long-term sonographic detectability of a hydrogel-based breast biopsy site marker.
Sakamoto N; Fukuma E; Tsunoda Y; Teraoka K; Koshida Y
Breast Cancer; 2018 Sep; 25(5):575-582. PubMed ID: 29572658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Iodine-125 Radioactive Seed Localization and Wire Localization for Resection of Breast Lesions.
Tran VT; David J; Patocskai E; Zummo-Soucy M; Younan R; Lalonde L; Labelle M; El Khoury M; Robidoux A; Trop I
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 Nov; 68(4):447-455. PubMed ID: 28927740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superiority of sonographic hematoma guided resection of mammogram only visible breast cancer: wire localization should be an exception--not the rule.
Layeequr Rahman R; Crawford S; Larkin A; Quinlan R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):2228-32. PubMed ID: 17514405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision.
Krekel NM; Zonderhuis BM; Stockmann HB; Schreurs WH; van der Veen H; de Lange de Klerk ES; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21194880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning curves in intraoperative ultrasound guided surgery in breast cancer based on complete breast cancer excision and no need for second surgeries.
Esgueva A; Rodríguez-Revuelto R; Espinosa-Bravo M; Salazar JP; Rubio IT
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):578-583. PubMed ID: 30737056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Indocyanine green fluorescence-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided excision: A randomized clinical trial.
Tong M; Guo W
Breast J; 2019 Mar; 25(2):278-281. PubMed ID: 30801900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician preference and patient satisfaction with radioactive seed versus wire localization.
Romanoff A; Schmidt H; McMurray M; Burnett A; Condren A; Port E
J Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 210():177-180. PubMed ID: 28457325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doppler Ultrasound-Visible SignalMark Microspheres are Better Identified than HydroMARK
Voss RK; Ward EP; Ojeda-Fournier H; Blair SL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3740-3746. PubMed ID: 30178390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficacy of radioactive seed localization with I-125 prior to lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy.
Sung JS; King V; Thornton CM; Brooks JD; Fry CW; El-Tamer M; Dauer LT; Brogi E; St Germain JM; Morris EA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1453-7. PubMed ID: 23684386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-step ultrasound localization of breast lesions and lumpectomy procedure.
Gittleman MA
Am J Surg; 2003 Oct; 186(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 14553856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic hematoma-guided vs wire-localized lumpectomy for breast cancer: a comparison of margins and volume of resection.
Layeequr Rahman R; Iuanow E; Crawford S; Quinlan R
Arch Surg; 2007 Apr; 142(4):343-6. PubMed ID: 17438168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
