These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25034850)

  • 1. Response.
    Shah JN; Weilert F; Bhat YM; Binmoeller KF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):365-6. PubMed ID: 25034850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response.
    Weilert F; Bhat YM; Binmoeller KF; Shah JN
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):242-3. PubMed ID: 25527062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EUS-FNA versus ERCP-guided sampling for suspected malignant biliary obstruction: which to choose?
    Ustundag Y; Alper E; Fusaroli P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):241-2. PubMed ID: 25527061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EUS-FNA versus ERCP-based tissue sampling: can intraductal aspiration improve ERCP diagnostic accuracy in suspected malignant biliary obstruction?
    Curcio G; Granata A; Barresi L; Tarantino I; Traina M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):365. PubMed ID: 25034849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response.
    Slivka A; Kahaleh M; Jamidar P; Gan I; Costamagna G; Cesaro P; Giovannini M; Caillol F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):970-1. PubMed ID: 26472005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study.
    Weilert F; Bhat YM; Binmoeller KF; Kane S; Jaffee IM; Shaw RE; Cameron R; Hashimoto Y; Shah JN
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Jul; 80(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 24559784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reply: To PMID 25616752.
    Slivka A; Gan I; Jamidar P; Costamagna G; Cesaro P; Giovannini M; Caillol F; Kahaleh M
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Sep; 149(3):819-20. PubMed ID: 26231598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Indeterminate Bile Duct Strictures: The Inaccuracies of Accuracy When Appraising the Value of a Diagnostic Test.
    Coté GA
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Sep; 149(3):817-9. PubMed ID: 26231604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Triple-tissue sampling during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography increases the overall diagnostic sensitivity for cholangiocarcinoma.
    Lee SJ; Lee YS; Lee MG; Lee SH; Shin E; Hwang JH
    Gut Liver; 2014 Nov; 8(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25368755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing malignant from benign biliary strictures: can confocal laser endomicroscopy close the gap?
    Baillie J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Feb; 81(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 25616753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy contribution in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures.
    Balderramo D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):970. PubMed ID: 26472004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-standing indeterminate biliary stricture with iterative negative tissue sampling revealed as cholangiocarcinoma under SpyGlassTM cholangiocoscopy.
    Figueroa Marrero A; Chavarría-Herbozo CM; de la Serna Higuera C; Pérez-Miranda M
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2017 Mar; 109(3):220-221. PubMed ID: 28256149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with biliary neoplasia.
    ; Anderson MA; Appalaneni V; Ben-Menachem T; Decker GA; Early DS; Evans JA; Fanelli RD; Fisher DA; Fisher LR; Fukami N; Hwang JH; Ikenberry SO; Jain R; Jue TL; Khan K; Krinsky ML; Malpas PM; Maple JT; Sharaf RN; Shergill AK; Dominitz JA; Cash BD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Feb; 77(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 23219047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary disorders: a multicenter clinical experience (with video).
    Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Kommaraju K; Zhu X; Hebert-Magee S; Hawes RH; Vargo JJ; Varadarajulu S; Parsi MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Oct; 84(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 26995690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bile duct wall metastasis from micropapillary variant transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder mimicking primary hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    Hong SP; Park SW; Lee SJ; Chung JP; Song SY; Chung JB; Kang JK; Cho NH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Nov; 56(5):756-60. PubMed ID: 12397294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of EUS in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and suspected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (with videos).
    Khashab MA; Fockens P; Al-Haddad MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Nov; 76(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 22749367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Astronomically high CA 19-9 in a patient with a benign lesion.
    Rao NA; Satyaprakash BS
    S Afr J Surg; 2013 Oct; 51(4):151. PubMed ID: 24209706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic transpapillary sampling methods for bile duct cancer: may intraductal aspiration improve diagnosis?
    Curcio G; Ligresti D; Traina M
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):163. PubMed ID: 25293441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic tissue sampling of the bile duct: can we do better?
    Raijman I
    Dig Endosc; 2014 Mar; 26(2):154-5. PubMed ID: 24581001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraprocedural tissue diagnosis during ERCP employing a new cytology preparation of forceps biopsy (Smash protocol).
    Wright ER; Bakis G; Srinivasan R; Raju R; Vittal H; Sanders MK; Bernadino K; Stefan A; Blaszyk H; Howell DA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Feb; 106(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 21102569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.