These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Recovery from blocking between outcomes. Wheeler DS; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some determinants of second-order conditioning. Witnauer JE; Miller RR Learn Behav; 2011 Mar; 39(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 21264564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cues trained apart compete for behavioral control in rats: convergence with the associative interference literature. Escobar M; Matute H; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Mar; 130(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11293462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retroactive interference: Counterconditioning and extinction with and without biologically significant outcomes. Jozefowiez J; Berruti AS; Moshchenko Y; Peña T; Polack CW; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(4):443-459. PubMed ID: 33030955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditions favoring retroactive interference between antecedent events (cue competition) and between subsequent events (outcome competition). Escobar M; Arcediano F; Miller RR Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Dec; 8(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 11848587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proactive interference by cues presented without outcomes: Differences in context specificity of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition. Miguez G; McConnell B; Polack CW; Miller RR Learn Behav; 2018 Sep; 46(3):265-280. PubMed ID: 29313238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Associative status of the training context determines the effectiveness of compound extinction. Witnauer JE; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 22229586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect. Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proactive interference between cues trained with a common outcome in first-order Pavlovian conditioning. Amundson JC; Escobar M; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 14570518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrasting AAC and ABC renewal: the role of context associations. Laborda MA; Witnauer JE; Miller RR Learn Behav; 2011 Mar; 39(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 21264561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulus competition between a discrete cue and a training context: Cue competition does not result from the division of a limited resource. Urushihara K; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 19364229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Degraded contingency revisited: posttraining extinction of a cover stimulus attenuates a target cue's behavioral control. Witnauer JE; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):440-50. PubMed ID: 17924791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Timing in retroactive interference. Escobar M; Miller RR Learn Behav; 2003 Aug; 31(3):257-72. PubMed ID: 14577549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protection from latent inhibition provided by a conditioned inhibitor. McConnell BL; Wheeler DS; Urcelay GP; Miller RR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):498-508. PubMed ID: 19839702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]