These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25037654)

  • 1. Motivational significance and cognitive effort elicit different late positive potentials.
    Matsuda I; Nittono H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Feb; 126(2):304-13. PubMed ID: 25037654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance.
    Leite J; Carvalho S; Galdo-Alvarez S; Alves J; Sampaio A; Gonçalves OF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 22226675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonaffective motivation modulates the sustained LPP (1,000-2,000 ms).
    Gable PA; Adams DL
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1251-4. PubMed ID: 23941161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE; Abraham KS; Alschuler DM; Alvarenga JE; Skipper J; Warner V; Bruder GE; Weissman MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():337-350. PubMed ID: 27263509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential.
    Nowparast Rostami H; Ouyang G; Bayer M; Schacht A; Zhou C; Sommer W
    Brain Topogr; 2016 Jan; 29(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 26012382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials.
    Hajcak G; MacNamara A; Foti D; Ferri J; Keil A
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 22155660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are blood-injection-injury stimuli different from other negative categories? An ERP study.
    Schäfer A; Scharmüller W; Leutgeb V; Köchel A; Schienle A
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 478(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 20470862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional event-related potentials are larger to figures than scenes but are similarly reduced by inattention.
    Nordström H; Wiens S
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 May; 13():49. PubMed ID: 22607397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes.
    Ferrari V; Codispoti M; Cardinale R; Bradley MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 20(10):1753-61. PubMed ID: 18370595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Simons RF
    Emotion; 2006 Aug; 6(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 16938092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Late positive potential to appetitive stimuli and local attentional bias.
    Gable PA; Harmon-Jones E
    Emotion; 2010 Jun; 10(3):441-6. PubMed ID: 20515232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The regulation of negative and positive emotions during picture viewing: an ERP study].
    Reva NV; Pavlov SV; Korenek VV; Loktev KV; Tumialis AV; Brak IV; Aftanas LI
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2015 Jan; 101(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 25868332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive conflict increases processing of negative, task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Ligeza TS; Wyczesany M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():126-135. PubMed ID: 28757233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The late positive potential predicts subsequent interference with target processing.
    Weinberg A; Hajcak G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2994-3007. PubMed ID: 21268668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: time-course of the late positive potential.
    Hajcak G; Dunning JP; Foti D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 19157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valence and arousal influence the late positive potential during central and lateralized presentation of images.
    O'Hare AJ; Atchley RA; Young KM
    Laterality; 2017 Sep; 22(5):541-559. PubMed ID: 27728992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shedding light on emotional perception: Interaction of brightness and semantic content in extrastriate visual cortex.
    Schettino A; Keil A; Porcu E; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():341-353. PubMed ID: 26994832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is elaboration of affective content sufficient to attenuate emotional responses during reappraisal procedures?
    Wyczesany M; Ligeza TS
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():99-107. PubMed ID: 28511783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HIV-positive females show blunted neurophysiological responses in an emotion-attention dual task paradigm.
    Tartar JL; McIntosh RC; Rosselli M; Widmayer SM; Nash AJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 125(6):1164-73. PubMed ID: 24405904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.