159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25037877)
1. Experimental and clinical assessment of three-dimensional cephalometry: a systematic review.
Smektała T; Jędrzejewski M; Szyndel J; Sporniak-Tutak K; Olszewski R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 25037877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review.
Pittayapat P; Limchaichana-Bolstad N; Willems G; Jacobs R
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 May; 17(2):69-91. PubMed ID: 24373559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.
Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e678-88. PubMed ID: 22322503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.
Olszewski R; Frison L; Schoenarts N; Khonsari RH; Odri GA; Zech F; Reychler H
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2407-2414. PubMed ID: 28004246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear accuracy and reliability of volume data sets acquired by two CBCT-devices and an MSCT using virtual models: a comparative in-vitro study.
Wikner J; Hanken H; Eulenburg C; Heiland M; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Riecke B; Friedrich RE
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25936361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Challenges in measuring angles between craniofacial structures.
Yatabe M; Gomes L; Ruellas AC; Lopinto J; Macron L; Paniagua B; Budin F; Prieto JC; Ioshida M; Cevidanes L
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 27():e20180380. PubMed ID: 31166412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography.
Santos Tde S; Gomes AC; de Melo DG; Melo AR; Cavalcante JR; de Araújo LC; Travassos RM; Martins-Filho PR; Piva MR; Silva HF
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23257480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
