These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25037877)

  • 21. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses.
    Olszewski R; Tanesy O; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 38(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 19574058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data.
    Xi T; van Loon B; Fudalej P; Bergé S; Swennen G; Maal T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23528746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional cephalometry: a method for the identification and for the orientation of the skull after cone-bean computed tomographic scan.
    Frongia G; Bracco P; Piancino MG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e308-11. PubMed ID: 23715002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
    Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Hassan B; Nijkamp P; Verheij H; Tairie J; Vink C; van der Stelt P; van Beek H
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21447781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy and reliability of linear measurements using 3-dimensional computed tomographic imaging software for Le Fort I Osteotomy.
    Gaia BF; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; Santos O; Costa FF; Cavalcanti MG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 24456609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 21889058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer.
    Olszewski R; Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1847-52. PubMed ID: 25176496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.
    Metzler P; Sun Y; Zemann W; Bartella A; Lehner M; Obwegeser JA; Kruse-Gujer AL; Lübbers HT
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 18(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 23559195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.
    Pittayapat P; Bornstein MM; Imada TS; Coucke W; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25161199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
    Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks--a three-dimensional computed tomography study.
    Titiz I; Laubinger M; Keller T; Hertrich K; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):276-86. PubMed ID: 21566086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking.
    Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Arbotto M; Gajny L; Rouch P; Schouman T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1367-1378. PubMed ID: 32169306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Cassetta M; Altieri F; Di Giorgio R; Silvestri A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):e311-5. PubMed ID: 26080244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements.
    Nalçaci R; Oztürk F; Sökücü O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 20100922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.