These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25038317)

  • 1. Quantifying the effects of the division of labor in metabolic pathways.
    Harvey E; Heys J; Gedeon T
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 360():222-242. PubMed ID: 25038317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competitive resource allocation to metabolic pathways contributes to overflow metabolisms and emergent properties in cross-feeding microbial consortia.
    Carlson RP; Beck AE; Phalak P; Fields MW; Gedeon T; Hanley L; Harcombe WR; Henson MA; Heys JJ
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Apr; 46(2):269-284. PubMed ID: 29472366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthetic Escherichia coli consortia engineered for syntrophy demonstrate enhanced biomass productivity.
    Bernstein HC; Paulson SD; Carlson RP
    J Biotechnol; 2012 Jan; 157(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 22015987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metabolic division of labor in microbial systems.
    Tsoi R; Wu F; Zhang C; Bewick S; Karig D; You L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(10):2526-2531. PubMed ID: 29463749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic flux balance analysis for synthetic microbial communities.
    Henson MA; Hanly TJ
    IET Syst Biol; 2014 Oct; 8(5):214-29. PubMed ID: 25257022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environment Constrains Fitness Advantages of Division of Labor in Microbial Consortia Engineered for Metabolite Push or Pull Interactions.
    Beck AE; Pintar K; Schepens D; Schrammeck A; Johnson T; Bleem A; Du M; Harcombe WR; Bernstein HC; Heys JJ; Gedeon T; Carlson RP
    mSystems; 2022 Aug; 7(4):e0005122. PubMed ID: 35762764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Network-based metabolic analysis and microbial community modeling.
    Cardona C; Weisenhorn P; Henry C; Gilbert JA
    Curr Opin Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 31():124-131. PubMed ID: 27060776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic flux balance modeling of microbial co-cultures for efficient batch fermentation of glucose and xylose mixtures.
    Hanly TJ; Henson MA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Feb; 108(2):376-85. PubMed ID: 20882517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Designing microbial communities to maximize the thermodynamic driving force for the production of chemicals.
    Bekiaris PS; Klamt S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jun; 17(6):e1009093. PubMed ID: 34129600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and characterization of synthetic fungal-bacterial consortia for direct production of isobutanol from cellulosic biomass.
    Minty JJ; Singer ME; Scholz SA; Bae CH; Ahn JH; Foster CE; Liao JC; Lin XN
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(36):14592-7. PubMed ID: 23959872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities.
    Zelezniak A; Andrejev S; Ponomarova O; Mende DR; Bork P; Patil KR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May; 112(20):6449-54. PubMed ID: 25941371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metabolic enzyme cost explains variable trade-offs between microbial growth rate and yield.
    Wortel MT; Noor E; Ferris M; Bruggeman FJ; Liebermeister W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1006010. PubMed ID: 29451895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Community flux balance analysis for microbial consortia at balanced growth.
    Khandelwal RA; Olivier BG; Röling WF; Teusink B; Bruggeman FJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64567. PubMed ID: 23741341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modification of glucose import capacity in Escherichia coli: physiologic consequences and utility for improving DNA vaccine production.
    Fuentes LG; Lara AR; Martínez LM; Ramírez OT; Martínez A; Bolívar F; Gosset G
    Microb Cell Fact; 2013 May; 12():42. PubMed ID: 23638701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stability of Cross-Feeding Polymorphisms in Microbial Communities.
    Gudelj I; Kinnersley M; Rashkov P; Schmidt K; Rosenzweig F
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005269. PubMed ID: 28036324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing Metabolic Division of Labor in Microbial Communities.
    Thommes M; Wang T; Zhao Q; Paschalidis IC; Segrè D
    mSystems; 2019; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 30984871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal protein production by a synthetic microbial consortium: coexistence, distribution of labor, and syntrophy.
    Martínez C; Cinquemani E; Jong H; Gouzé JL
    J Math Biol; 2023 Jul; 87(1):23. PubMed ID: 37395814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single strain control of microbial consortia.
    Fedorec AJH; Karkaria BD; Sulu M; Barnes CP
    Nat Commun; 2021 Mar; 12(1):1977. PubMed ID: 33785746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-scale in silico aided metabolic analysis and flux comparisons of Escherichia coli to improve succinate production.
    Wang Q; Chen X; Yang Y; Zhao X
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Dec; 73(4):887-94. PubMed ID: 16927085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Even allocation of benefits stabilizes microbial community engaged in metabolic division of labor.
    Wang M; Chen X; Liu X; Fang Y; Zheng X; Huang T; Tang YQ; Ackermann M; Nie Y; Wu XL
    Cell Rep; 2022 Sep; 40(13):111410. PubMed ID: 36170826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.