These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25038806)
1. Positive predictive value of additional synchronous breast lesions in whole-breast ultrasonography at the diagnosis of breast cancer: clinical and imaging factors. Kim AH; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Park BW; Moon HJ Ultrasonography; 2014 Jul; 33(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 25038806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Additional malignant breast lesions detected on second-look US after breast MRI vs. additional malignant lesions detected on initial US in breast cancer patients: comparison of US characteristics. Park VY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Kim EK Ultraschall Med; 2014 Oct; 35(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 24510491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low rates of additional cancer detection by magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who undergo preoperative mammography and ultrasonography. Kim J; Han W; Moon HG; Ahn SK; Shin HC; You JM; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY J Breast Cancer; 2014 Jun; 17(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 25013439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absence of epithelial atypia in B3-lesions of the breast is associated with decreased risk for malignancy. Mayer S; Kayser G; Rücker G; Bögner D; Hirschfeld M; Hug C; Stickeler E; Gitsch G; Erbes T Breast; 2017 Feb; 31():144-149. PubMed ID: 27866089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors. Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of benignity or malignancy of a lesion using BI-RADS. Masroor I J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Nov; 15(11):686-8. PubMed ID: 16300702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive predictive value for malignancy of uncertain malignant potential (B3) breast lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB): is surgical excision still recommended? Lucioni M; Rossi C; Lomoro P; Ballati F; Fanizza M; Ferrari A; Garcia-Etienne CA; Boveri E; Meloni G; Sommaruga MG; Ferraris E; Lasagna A; Bonzano E; Paulli M; Sgarella A; Di Giulio G Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):920-927. PubMed ID: 32816199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biopsy rate and positive predictive value for breast cancer in BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions. Wiratkapun C; Bunyapaiboonsri W; Wibulpolprasert B; Lertsithichai P J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):830-7. PubMed ID: 20649064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging-guided biopsy of (18)F-FDG-avid extrapulmonary lesions: do lesion location and morphologic features on CT affect the positive predictive value for malignancy? Nguyen ML; Gervais DA; Blake MA; Mueller PR; Sahani DV; Hahn PF; Uppot RN AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 23883226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. Li L; Roth R; Germaine P; Ren S; Lee M; Hunter K; Tinney E; Liao L Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Feb; 98(2):113-123. PubMed ID: 27687829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positive predictive value of breast cancer in the lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 5. Wiratkapun C; Lertsithichai P; Wibulpholprasert B J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89(8):1253-9. PubMed ID: 17048437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Mahoney MC; Gatsonis C; Hanna L; DeMartini WB; Lehman C Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22589320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fat Necrosis of the Breast: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics and Pathologic Correlation. Hassan HHM; El Abd AM; Abdel Bary A; Naguib NNN Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):985-992. PubMed ID: 29426684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size. Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast. Cho YH; Cho KR; Park EK; Seo BK; Woo OH; Cho SB; Bae JW Iran J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 13(1):e30909. PubMed ID: 27127579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Palpable Breast Mass and Correlation with Histopathology. Jahan AB; Ahmed MU; Begum M; Hossain MM; Rahman MM; Sarwar JM; Hossain MZ; Begum F; Saha PL; Haque S; Muktadira M Mymensingh Med J; 2017 Apr; 26(2):223-229. PubMed ID: 28588154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Lesions Detected via Molecular Breast Imaging: Physiological Parameters Affecting Interpretation. Ching JG; Brem RF Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1568-1576. PubMed ID: 29580791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]