125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25039972)
1. Foreign body giant cell reaction to tarSys™ xenograft.
Munday WR; Klett Z; McNiff JM; Ko C
J Cutan Pathol; 2014 Oct; 41(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25039972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.
Anderson JM; Rodriguez A; Chang DT
Semin Immunol; 2008 Apr; 20(2):86-100. PubMed ID: 18162407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral and maxillofacial pathology case of the month. Foreign body giant cell reaction to cosmetic filler material Radiesse.
Assi ; Pope ; Kessler
Tex Dent J; 2013 Jul; 130(7):582, 620-1. PubMed ID: 24015449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The CC chemokine ligand, CCL2/MCP1, participates in macrophage fusion and foreign body giant cell formation.
Kyriakides TR; Foster MJ; Keeney GE; Tsai A; Giachelli CM; Clark-Lewis I; Rollins BJ; Bornstein P
Am J Pathol; 2004 Dec; 165(6):2157-66. PubMed ID: 15579457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo quantitative and qualitative assessment of foreign body giant cell formation on biomaterials in mice deficient in natural killer lymphocyte subsets, mast cells, or the interleukin-4 receptorα and in severe combined immunodeficient mice.
Yang J; Jao B; McNally AK; Anderson JM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 Jun; 102(6):2017-23. PubMed ID: 24616384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foreign body reaction to artelon spacer: case report.
Giuffrida AY; Gyuricza C; Perino G; Weiland AJ
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1388-92. PubMed ID: 19801107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Theoretical analysis of in vivo macrophage adhesion and foreign body giant cell formation on polydimethylsiloxane, low density polyethylene, and polyetherurethanes.
Kao WJ; Zhao QH; Hiltner A; Anderson JM
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jan; 28(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 8126032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inhibition of foreign body giant cell formation by 4- hexylresorcinol through suppression of diacylglycerol kinase delta gene expression.
Kweon H; Kim SG; Choi JY
Biomaterials; 2014 Oct; 35(30):8576-84. PubMed ID: 25023393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Macrophage reaction against biomaterials in the mouse model - Phenotypes, functions and markers.
Klopfleisch R
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 43():3-13. PubMed ID: 27395828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular Characterization of Macrophage-Biomaterial Interactions.
Moore LB; Kyriakides TR
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 865():109-22. PubMed ID: 26306446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role for interleukin-4 in foreign-body giant cell formation on a poly(etherurethane urea) in vivo.
Kao WJ; McNally AK; Hiltner A; Anderson JM
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Oct; 29(10):1267-75. PubMed ID: 8557729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heterogeneity of biomaterial-induced multinucleated giant cells: Possible importance for the regeneration process?
Barbeck M; Motta A; Migliaresi C; Sader R; Kirkpatrick CJ; Ghanaati S
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Feb; 104(2):413-8. PubMed ID: 26422451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of osteopontin in foreign body giant cell formation.
Tsai AT; Rice J; Scatena M; Liaw L; Ratner BD; Giachelli CM
Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(29):5835-43. PubMed ID: 15949549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Foreign body reaction after lens implantation. Correlation between visual acuity and density of giant cells].
Wenzel M; Caspers S; Saari KM; Hayes P; Reim M
Ophthalmologe; 1995 Jun; 92(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 7655199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local giant cell foreign body reaction after silicone injection for fecal incontinence in humans: two case reports.
van Wunnik B; Driessen A; Baeten C
Tech Coloproctol; 2012 Oct; 16(5):395-7. PubMed ID: 21695441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Connexin 43 expression of foreign body giant cells after implantation of nanoparticulate hydroxyapatite.
Herde K; Hartmann S; Brehm R; Kilian O; Heiss C; Hild A; Alt V; Bergmann M; Schnettler R; Wenisch S
Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(33):4912-21. PubMed ID: 17719629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The in vivo inflammatory and foreign body giant cell response against different poly(l-lactide-co-d/l-lactide) implants is primarily determined by material morphology rather than surface chemistry.
Lucke S; Walschus U; Hoene A; Schnabelrauch M; Nebe JB; Finke B; Schlosser M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Oct; 106(10):2726-2734. PubMed ID: 30051967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Material dependent differences in inflammatory gene expression by giant cells during the foreign body reaction.
Luttikhuizen DT; Dankers PY; Harmsen MC; van Luyn MJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Dec; 83(3):879-86. PubMed ID: 17567860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of histological and three-dimensional characteristics of porous titanium granules and deproteinized bovine particulate grafts used for sinus floor augmentation in humans: a pilot study.
Vandeweghe S; Leconte C; Ono D; Coelho PG; Jimbo R
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 23736312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrastructural aspects of foreign body giant cells generated on different substrates.
Ten Harkel B; Koopsen J; van Putten SM; van Veen H; Picavet DI; de Vries TJ; Bank RA; Everts V
J Struct Biol; 2016 Jul; 195(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27155321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
