These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25040156)

  • 1. Neural correlates of endogenous attention, exogenous attention and inhibition of return in touch.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 40(2):2389-98. PubMed ID: 25040156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reflexive attention in touch: an investigation of event related potentials and behavioural responses.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):313-22. PubMed ID: 22142773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks.
    Chica AB; Lupianez J; Bartolomeo P
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 23(7):1015-34. PubMed ID: 21049365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potential evidence for the use of external coordinates in the preparation of tactile attention by the early blind.
    Eardley AF; van Velzen J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 May; 33(10):1897-907. PubMed ID: 21545656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological modulations of exogenous attention by intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Mar; 85():239-50. PubMed ID: 24463767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A direct comparison of exogenous and endogenous inhibition of return and selective attention mechanisms in the somatosensory system.
    Cohen JC; Bolanowski SJ; Verrillo RT
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2005 Dec; 22(4):269-79. PubMed ID: 16503580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the effect of posture change on tactile inhibition-of-return.
    Röder B; Spence C; Rösler F
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 11914791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition.
    Poliakoff E; O'Boyle DJ; Moore AP; McGlone FP; Cody FW; Spence C
    Brain; 2003 Sep; 126(Pt 9):2081-92. PubMed ID: 12876143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal expectancies and rhythmic cueing in touch: The influence of spatial attention.
    Jones A
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():140-150. PubMed ID: 30248473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.
    Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Solano C; Weaver B; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):753-73. PubMed ID: 11548033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous attention in touch.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Dec; 30(4):161-6. PubMed ID: 23590842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention.
    Eimer M; Forster B; Fieger A; Harbich S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):596-608. PubMed ID: 15036056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind.
    Forster B; Eardley AF; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1131(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 17173872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.