196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25040910)
1. MRI-guided breast needle core biopsies: pathologic features of newly diagnosed malignancies.
Manion E; Brock JE; Raza S; Reisenbichler ES
Breast J; 2014; 20(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 25040910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001.
Li CI; Malone KE; Saltzman BS; Daling JR
Cancer; 2006 May; 106(10):2104-12. PubMed ID: 16604564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement in DCIS detection rates by MRI over time in a high-risk breast screening study.
Warner E; Causer PA; Wong JW; Wright FC; Jong RA; Hill KA; Messner SJ; Yaffe MJ; Narod SA; Plewes DB
Breast J; 2011; 17(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 21251121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical significance of breast MRI in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on needle biopsy.
Miyashita M; Amano G; Ishida T; Tamaki K; Uchimura F; Ono T; Yajima M; Kuriya Y; Ohuchi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 23592884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of residual invasive disease after core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rutstein LA; Johnson RR; Poller WR; Dabbs D; Groblewski J; Rakitt T; Tsung A; Kirchner T; Sumkin J; Keenan D; Soran A; Ahrendt G; Falk JS
Breast J; 2007; 13(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 17461899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk predictors of underestimation and the need for sentinel node biopsy in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ by preoperative needle biopsy.
Park HS; Park S; Cho J; Park JM; Kim SI; Park BW
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 107(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 23007901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.
Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.
Hartman AR; Daniel BL; Kurian AW; Mills MA; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Kingham KE; Chun NM; Herfkens RJ; Ford JM; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 14745863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonmass enhancement lesions of the breast on core needle biopsy: outcomes, frequency of malignancy, and pathologic findings.
Bartels AK; Fadare O; Hasteh F; Zare SY
Hum Pathol; 2021 May; 111():92-97. PubMed ID: 33722650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-risk lesions at MRI-guided breast biopsy: frequency and rate of underestimation.
Lourenco AP; Khalil H; Sanford M; Donegan L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):682-6. PubMed ID: 25148176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BI-RADS-MRI terminology and evaluation of intraductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tozaki M
Breast Cancer; 2013 Jan; 20(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 22109641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.
Ottesen GL
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
