These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25040961)

  • 21. Predicting Malignancy in Adnexal Masses by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis-Simple Rules.
    Solanki V; Singh P; Sharma C; Ghuman N; Sureka B; Shekhar S; Gothwal M; Yadav G
    J Midlife Health; 2020; 11(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 33767562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sonographic Diagnosis of Tubal Cancer with IOTA Simple Rules Plus Pattern Recognition.
    Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Tantipalakorn C; Tinnangwattana D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(11):3011-3015. PubMed ID: 29172273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultrasound differentiation between benign versus malignant adnexal masses in pregnant patients.
    Rabiej-Wronska E; Wiechec M; Pitynski K; Wiercinska E; Kotlarz A
    Ginekol Pol; 2022; 93(8):643-649. PubMed ID: 35072237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules versus pattern recognition to differentiate between malignant and benign ovarian masses.
    Dakhly DMR; Gaafar HM; Sediek MM; Ibrahim MF; Momtaz M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Dec; 147(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 31520402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association between the sonographer's experience and diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules.
    Ning CP; Ji X; Wang HQ; Du XY; Niu HT; Fang SB
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 16(1):179. PubMed ID: 30185198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents Can Accurately Classify Benign Ovarian Tumors Using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Rules.
    Sebajuri JMV; Magriples U; Small M; Ntasumbumuyange D; Rulisa S; Bazzett-Matabele L
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jul; 39(7):1389-1393. PubMed ID: 32012337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of IOTA Simple Ultrasound Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumours.
    Garg S; Kaur A; Mohi JK; Sibia PK; Kaur N
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Aug; 11(8):TC06-TC09. PubMed ID: 28969237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.
    Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
    Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving the performance of IOTA simple rules: sonographic assessment of adnexal masses with resource-effective use of a magnetic resonance scoring (ADNEX MR scoring system).
    Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Silva ACB; de Oliveira Barros RH; Jales RM; Derchain S
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Oct; 45(10):3218-3229. PubMed ID: 31482379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Value of IOTA Simple Rules Combined With CEUS Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Its Correlation With MVD and VEGF: A Preliminary Study.
    Liu C; Li Y; Zhu Y; Lu M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Dec; 41(12):2983-2992. PubMed ID: 35481545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
    Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
    Pelayo M; Pelayo-Delgado I; Sancho-Sauco J; Sanchez-Zurdo J; Abarca-Martinez L; Corraliza-Galán V; Martin-Gromaz C; Pablos-Antona MJ; Zurita-Calvo J; Alcázar JL
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
    Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.
    Esquivel Villabona AL; Rodríguez JN; Ayala N; Buriticá C; Gómez AC; Velandia AM; Rodríguez N; Alcázar JL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 33890698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
    Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.