214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25040965)
1. Cost effective analysis of recall methods for cervical cancer screening in Selangor--results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Rashid RM; Ramli S; John J; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5143-7. PubMed ID: 25040965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the phone call the most effective method for recall in cervical cancer screening?--results from a randomised control trial.
Abdul Rashid RM; Mohamed M; Hamid ZA; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5901-4. PubMed ID: 24289597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.
Paulauskiene J; Stelemekas M; Ivanauskiene R; Petkeviciene J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31835649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccines in the prevention of cervical cancer in Malaysia.
Ezat SW; Aljunid S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(4):943-51. PubMed ID: 21133606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applying the Transtheoretical Model to evaluate the effect of a call-recall program in enhancing Pap smear practice: a cluster randomized trial.
Abdullah F; Su TT
Prev Med; 2013; 57 Suppl():S83-6. PubMed ID: 23415623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timely reminder interventions to improve annual Papanicolaou (Pap) smear rates among HIV-infected women in an outpatient center of southern Nevada: a short report.
Ganta V; Moonie S; Patel D; Hunt AT; Richardson J; Di John D; Ezeanolue EE
AIDS Care; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1099-1101. PubMed ID: 28460538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the feasibility of using mobile phones to improve the management of clients with cervical cancer precursor lesions.
Moodley J; Constant D; Botha MH; van der Merwe FH; Edwards A; Momberg M
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):2. PubMed ID: 30616579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial.
Kiran T; Davie S; Moineddin R; Lofters A
J Am Board Fam Med; 2018; 31(6):857-868. PubMed ID: 30413542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Easy screening for everyone.
Palazzi M; Severi M; Imolesi C; Vitali P; Farneti M; Bianchini A; Cristallo T
Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(3-4):179-84. PubMed ID: 27436251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adapting the Australian system: is an organized screening program feasible in Malaysia?--an overview of cervical cancer screening in both countries.
Rashid RM; Dahlui M; Mohamed M; Gertig D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(3):2141-6. PubMed ID: 23679334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical Screening Reminders for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women in Primary Care-Randomised Controlled Trial of Letter vs. Phone/SMS Reminders.
Ivers R; Levett T; Wynn K
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jun; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 37444104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.
Bowles EJ; Gao H; Brandzel S; Bradford SC; Buist DS
Prev Med; 2016 May; 86():19-27. PubMed ID: 26820221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a worksite cervical screening initiative to increase Pap smear uptake in Malaysia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Abdullah F; O'Rorke M; Murray L; Su TT
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():572126. PubMed ID: 24073411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of patient adherence and test performance on the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in developing countries: the case of Honduras.
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Burgess JF; Simon CJ
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 19944623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Text messages to increase attendance to follow-up cervical cancer screening appointments among HPV-positive Tanzanian women (Connected2Care): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Linde DS; Andersen MS; Mwaiselage JD; Manongi R; Kjaer SK; Rasch V
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):555. PubMed ID: 29162148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
