607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25041013)
21. Clinical and functional comparison between stapled colonic J-pouch low rectal anastomosis and hand-sewn colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for very low rectal cancer.
Takase Y; Oya M; Komatsu J
Surg Today; 2002; 32(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12027196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Functional outcomes and local control are acceptable following hand-sewn colo-anal anastomoses for rectal cancer: Results of long-term follow-up.
Hudson D; Entriken F; Hodder R; Warner M
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Mar; 92(3):390-396. PubMed ID: 34405511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Anterior resection with colo-anal anastomosis for low rectal cancer].
Lazuskas T; Lelcuk S; Michowitz M; Rabau M
Harefuah; 1994 May; 126(9):505-6, 563. PubMed ID: 8034262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. IDEAL Stage 2a/b prospective cohort study of transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Harji D; Fernandez B; Boissieras L; Celerier B; Rullier E; Denost Q
Colorectal Dis; 2023 Dec; 25(12):2346-2353. PubMed ID: 37919463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Single-stapled anastomosis is associated with a lower anastomotic leak rate than double-stapled technique after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for MRI-defined low rectal cancer.
Foppa C; Carvello M; Maroli A; Sacchi M; Gramellini M; Montorsi M; Spinelli A
Surgery; 2023 Jun; 173(6):1367-1373. PubMed ID: 36967334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Complications of stapled anastomoses in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: colorectal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis.
Burke ER; Welvaart K
J Surg Oncol; 1990 Nov; 45(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 2232808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma rectum.
Sarker SK; Chaudhry R; Sinha VK
Indian J Cancer; 1994 Jun; 31(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 7927447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction With Single Stapling Colorectal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Technical Considerations.
Saurabh B; Chang SC; Ke TW; Huang YC; Kato T; Wang HM; Tzu-Liang Chen W; Fingerhut A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Jan; 60(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 27926556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Individual surgeon is an independent risk factor for leak after double-stapled colorectal anastomosis: An institutional analysis of 800 patients.
García-Granero E; Navarro F; Cerdán Santacruz C; Frasson M; García-Granero A; Marinello F; Flor-Lorente B; Espí A
Surgery; 2017 Nov; 162(5):1006-1016. PubMed ID: 28739093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Single-stapled double-pursestring anastomosis after anterior resection of the rectum.
Marecik SJ; Chaudhry V; Pearl R; Park JJ; Prasad LM
Am J Surg; 2007 Mar; 193(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 17320542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis.
Dauser B; Braunschmid T; Ghaffari S; Riss S; Stift A; Herbst F
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Oct; 398(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 23943311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling in lower anterior resection reduce the need for a temporary diverting ostomy?
Baek SJ; Kim J; Kwak J; Kim SH
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 19(32):5309-13. PubMed ID: 23983434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transanal Transection and Single-Stapled Anastomosis (TTSS): A comparison of anastomotic leak rates with the double-stapled technique and with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer.
Spinelli A; Foppa C; Carvello M; Sacchi M; De Lucia F; Clerico G; Carrano FM; Maroli A; Montorsi M; Heald RJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 47(12):3123-3129. PubMed ID: 34384655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.
Nurkin S; Kakarla VR; Ruiz DE; Cance WG; Tiszenkel HI
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e309-16. PubMed ID: 23586660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficacy of transanal tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancers: a retrospective cohort study in a single institution.
Hidaka E; Ishida F; Mukai S; Nakahara K; Takayanagi D; Maeda C; Takehara Y; Tanaka J; Kudo SE
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):863-7. PubMed ID: 25052128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery.
Yang CS; Choi GS; Park JS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Choi JI; Han KS
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Dec; 18(12):O445-O452. PubMed ID: 27611180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients.
Katsuno H; Shiomi A; Ito M; Koide Y; Maeda K; Yatsuoka T; Hase K; Komori K; Minami K; Sakamoto K; Saida Y; Saito N
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2848-56. PubMed ID: 26487228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Pucciarelli S; Del Bianco P; Pace U; Bianco F; Restivo A; Maretto I; Selvaggi F; Zorcolo L; De Franciscis S; Asteria C; Urso EDL; Cuicchi D; Pellino G; Morpurgo E; La Torre G; Jovine E; Belluco C; La Torre F; Amato A; Chiappa A; Infantino A; Barina A; Spolverato G; Rega D; Kilmartin D; De Salvo GL; Delrio P
Br J Surg; 2019 Aug; 106(9):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 31233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison of colorectal mechanical suture techniques].
De Salvo L; Razzetta F; Cagnazzo A; Tassone U; Arezzo A; Mattioli FP
Ann Ital Chir; 1997; 68(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 9454552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
