BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25041382)

  • 1. Assessment of deep tissue hyperalgesia in the groin - a method comparison of electrical vs. pressure stimulation.
    Aasvang EK; Werner MU; Kehlet H
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2014 Sep; 58(8):986-96. PubMed ID: 25041382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
    Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can preoperative electrical nociceptive stimulation predict acute pain after groin herniotomy?
    Aasvang EK; Hansen JB; Kehlet H
    J Pain; 2008 Oct; 9(10):940-4. PubMed ID: 18650130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Referred pain and cutaneous responses from deep tissue electrical pain stimulation in the groin.
    Aasvang EK; Werner MU; Kehlet H
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Aug; 115(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 26071091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
    Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
    Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing test-retest reliability and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation using different combinations of test and conditioning stimuli.
    Imai Y; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Arendt Nielsen L
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2016; 33(3-4):169-177. PubMed ID: 27650216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of post-operative pain by an electrical pain stimulus.
    Nielsen PR; Nørgaard L; Rasmussen LS; Kehlet H
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 May; 51(5):582-6. PubMed ID: 17430320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure algometry with a rotational fanning probe improves the detection of experimental muscle hyperalgesia.
    Adnadjevic D; Graven-Nielsen T
    Pain Med; 2015 Mar; 16(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 25529363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest reliability of subjective supra-threshold scaling of multiple pressure-pain sensations among healthy individuals: a study using hydraulic pressure algometry.
    Dissanayaka TD; Farrell M; Zoghi M; Egan GF; Jaberzadeh S
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018; 35(3-4):153-161. PubMed ID: 30299201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers.
    Gröne E; Crispin A; Fleckenstein J; Irnich D; Treede RD; Lang PM
    J Pain; 2012 Jan; 13(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 22208803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reliability of a new technique with pressure algometry applied to teeth in healthy Chinese individuals.
    Liu R; Gu X; Zhang J; Yu L; Chen W; Wang K; Svensson P
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Jun; 124(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 27017942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized cuff pressure algometry: A new method to assess deep-tissue hypersensitivity in fibromyalgia.
    Jespersen A; Dreyer L; Kendall S; Graven-Nielsen T; Arendt-Nielsen L; Bliddal H; Danneskiold-Samsoe B
    Pain; 2007 Sep; 131(1-2):57-62. PubMed ID: 17257757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability, repeatability, and sensitivity of an automated deformation-controlled indentation on pressure pain threshold measurement.
    Koo TK; Guo JY; Brown CM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Feb; 36(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 23499143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of musculoskeletal pain sensitivity and temporal summation by cuff pressure algometry: a reliability study.
    Graven-Nielsen T; Vaegter HB; Finocchietti S; Handberg G; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Pain; 2015 Nov; 156(11):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 26172551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. User-independent assessment of conditioning pain modulation by cuff pressure algometry.
    Graven-Nielsen T; Izumi M; Petersen KK; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Eur J Pain; 2017 Mar; 21(3):552-561. PubMed ID: 27859944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliable estimation of nociceptive withdrawal reflex thresholds.
    Jensen MB; Biurrun Manresa J; Andersen OK
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Sep; 253():110-5. PubMed ID: 26112333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responsiveness of electrical nociceptive detection thresholds to capsaicin (8 %)-induced changes in nociceptive processing.
    Doll RJ; van Amerongen G; Hay JL; Groeneveld GJ; Veltink PH; Buitenweg JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2505-14. PubMed ID: 27142052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chronic pancreatitis patients show hyperalgesia of central origin: a pilot study.
    Buscher HC; Wilder-Smith OH; van Goor H
    Eur J Pain; 2006 May; 10(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 16087373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
    Moana-Filho EJ; Alonso AA; Kapos FP; Leon-Salazar V; Durand SH; Hodges JS; Nixdorf DR
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cuff Algometry for Estimation of Hyperalgesia and Pain Summation.
    Lindskou TA; Christensen SW; Graven-Nielsen T
    Pain Med; 2017 Mar; 18(3):468-476. PubMed ID: 27558855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.