488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25042540)
1. Glioma grading using apparent diffusion coefficient map: application of histogram analysis based on automatic segmentation.
Lee J; Choi SH; Kim JH; Sohn CH; Lee S; Jeong J
NMR Biomed; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1046-52. PubMed ID: 25042540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two region-of-interest placement methods for histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for glioma grading.
Hieu ND; Hung ND; Hung ND; Hien MM; Anh DV; Dung LT
Clin Ter; 2024; 175(3):128-136. PubMed ID: 38767069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 24316663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability.
Han X; Suo S; Sun Y; Zu J; Qu J; Zhou Y; Chen Z; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):722-730. PubMed ID: 27527072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Voxel-based clustered imaging by multiparameter diffusion tensor images for glioma grading.
Inano R; Oishi N; Kunieda T; Arakawa Y; Yamao Y; Shibata S; Kikuchi T; Fukuyama H; Miyamoto S
Neuroimage Clin; 2014; 5():396-407. PubMed ID: 25180159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glioma: Application of histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to tumor grading.
Jung SC; Yeom JA; Kim JH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Shin H; Lee AL; Yun TJ; Park CK; Sohn CH; Park SH; Choi SH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1103-10. PubMed ID: 24384119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparative Study of 2 Different Segmentation Methods of ADC Histogram for Differentiation Genetic Subtypes in Lower-Grade Diffuse Gliomas.
Liu D; Gao SX; Liao HF; Xu JM; Wen M
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():9549361. PubMed ID: 33062706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of diffusion tensor imaging metrics for gliomas grading at 3 T.
Server A; Graff BA; Josefsen R; Orheim TE; Schellhorn T; Nordhøy W; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):e156-65. PubMed ID: 24457139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic vessel removal in gliomas from dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.
Emblem KE; Due-Tonnessen P; Hald JK; Bjornerud A
Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1210-7. PubMed ID: 19253390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-Gaussian diffusion MR imaging of glioma: comparisons of multiple diffusion parameters and correlation with histologic grade and MIB-1 (Ki-67 labeling) index.
Yan R; Haopeng P; Xiaoyuan F; Jinsong W; Jiawen Z; Chengjun Y; Tianming Q; Ji X; Mao S; Yueyue D; Yong Z; Jianfeng L; Zhenwei Y
Neuroradiology; 2016 Feb; 58(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 26494463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a high b-value for diffusion weighted imaging of peritumoral regions to differentiate high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases.
Han C; Huang S; Guo J; Zhuang X; Han H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25223489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading of Gliomas.
Arevalo-Perez J; Peck KK; Young RJ; Holodny AI; Karimi S; Lyo JK
J Neuroimaging; 2015; 25(5):792-8. PubMed ID: 25867683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glioma: application of whole-tumor texture analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of tumor heterogeneity.
Ryu YJ; Choi SH; Park SJ; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108335. PubMed ID: 25268588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.
Suo ST; Chen XX; Fan Y; Wu LM; Yao QY; Cao MQ; Liu Q; Xu JR
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 24833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation between low-grade and high-grade glioma using combined diffusion tensor imaging metrics.
Ma L; Song ZJ
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 115(12):2489-95. PubMed ID: 24183513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grading Gliomas Capability: Comparison between Visual Assessment and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Value Measurement on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI).
Phuttharak W; Thammaroj J; Wara-Asawapati S; Panpeng K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Feb; 21(2):385-390. PubMed ID: 32102515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.
Server A; Kulle B; Maehlen J; Josefsen R; Schellhorn T; Kumar T; Langberg CW; Nakstad PH
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 19449234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
