These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2504338)

  • 1. The politics of inadequate registers.
    Armstrong EM
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):73. PubMed ID: 2504338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resulting fears.
    Willis J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Feb 21-27; 86(8):16-7. PubMed ID: 2320462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards effective cervical screening.
    Havelock C; Havelock P
    Practitioner; 1994 Apr; 238(1537):296-301. PubMed ID: 8183816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening and government policy.
    Tankel JW
    BMJ; 1989 Aug; 299(6696):458. PubMed ID: 2507017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How not to organise a cervical screening programme.
    Skegg DC
    N Z Med J; 1989 Oct; 102(877):527-8. PubMed ID: 2797586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening: the inadequacy of population registers.
    Bowling A; Jacobson B
    BMJ; 1989 Mar; 298(6673):545-6. PubMed ID: 2495109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical screening laboratories should be accredited.
    Beecham L
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7131):572. PubMed ID: 9518900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical screening: the next five years.
    Haddow P
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 10444720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lessons from cervical screening in the UK.
    Raffle AE
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Feb; 97(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 12669685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical screening: how adequate is the feedback to GPs?
    Hanratty B; Gledhill A; Patterson W
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Jun; 49(443):484-5. PubMed ID: 10562753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
    Herbert A
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The screening muddle.
    Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9101):459. PubMed ID: 9482430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    McCartney P
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):246-7. PubMed ID: 7616815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Danish Quality Database for Cervical Cancer Screening].
    Rygaard C
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(42):2534. PubMed ID: 23079437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
    Payne L; Lavis P
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoring confidence.
    Oliver G
    Nurs Stand; 1997 Oct 29-Nov 4; 12(6):16. PubMed ID: 9407858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of a cancer control programme.
    Knox EG; Woodman CB
    Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):379-401. PubMed ID: 3242791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Register-based studies of cancer screening effects.
    Von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E; Rebolj M
    Scand J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 39(7 Suppl):158-64. PubMed ID: 21775376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the UK ready to embrace HPV testing?
    Franco EL
    Lancet Oncol; 2009 Jul; 10(7):643-4. PubMed ID: 19573795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
    Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.