BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2504348)

  • 1. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.
    Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):98-100. PubMed ID: 2504348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.
    Shroff KJ; Corrigan AM; Bosher M; Edmonds MP; Sacks D; Coleman DV
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6659):1317-8. PubMed ID: 3144375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of a national Family Health Services Authority based cervical cytology system.
    Amery J; Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    Health Trends; 1992; 24(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 10123981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems of cervical cancer screening programmes.
    Rang EH; Tod ED
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Jun; 38(311):267-9. PubMed ID: 3255814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
    Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
    Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
    Ridsdale LL
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening.
    Naish J; Brown J; Denton B
    BMJ; 1994 Oct; 309(6962):1126-8. PubMed ID: 7987106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audit of deaths from cervical cancer: proposal for an essential component of the National Screening Programme.
    Slater DN; Milner PC; Radley H
    J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jan; 47(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 8132804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An audit of a cervical smear screening programme.
    Moodie PJ; Kljakovic M; McLeod DK
    N Z Med J; 1989 Jul; 102(872):374-6. PubMed ID: 2797554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.
    Meadows P
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Nov; 37(304):500-3. PubMed ID: 3505643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How district health authorities organise cervical screening.
    Elkind A; Eardley A; Thompson R; Smith A
    BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):915-8. PubMed ID: 2261539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The use of interactive medical data transfer to increase effectiveness of a mass screening program].
    Knapp P; Zbroch T; Knapp P
    Ginekol Pol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):896-903. PubMed ID: 15754581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening in women aged 50-60.
    Robertson AJ; Reid GS; Stoker CA; Bissett C; Waugh N; Fenton I; Rowan J; Halkerston R
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):163-6. PubMed ID: 2504360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the effects of population mobility on cervical screening coverage.
    Millett C; Bardsley M; Binysh K
    Public Health; 2002 Nov; 116(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 12407475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract.
    Reid GS; Robertson AJ; Bissett C; Smith J; Waugh N; Halkerston R
    BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6800):447-50. PubMed ID: 1912838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
    Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
    Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.