These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25043830)

  • 21. Gender differences in attitudes toward psychopathic sexual offenders.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 16491475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preventative detention decisions: reliance on expert assessments and evidence of partisan allegiance within the Canadian context.
    Blais J
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):74-91. PubMed ID: 25693952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
    Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: a case law survey.
    DeMatteo D; Edens JF; Galloway M; Cox J; Smith ST; Formon D
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24127888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response to Simon: Legal relevance demands that evil be defined and standardized.
    Welner M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 14974795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risk assessment communication difficulties: An empirical examination of the effects of categorical versus probabilistic risk communication in sexually violent predator decisions.
    Krauss DA; Cook GI; Klapatch L
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):532-553. PubMed ID: 30294807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom.
    Kipoulas E; Edwards I; Radakovic R; Beazley PI
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 96():102016. PubMed ID: 39213688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. From Hendricks to Crane: the sexually violent predator trilogy and the inchoate jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 12875504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A practical guide for the evaluation of sexual recidivism risk in mentally retarded sex offenders.
    Phenix A; Sreenivasan S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):509-24. PubMed ID: 20018999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
    Maeder EM; Pica E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Is the court-ordered treatment indication by the expert based on a medical diagnosis?].
    Spriet H; Abondo M; Naudet F; Bouvet R; Le Gueut M
    Encephale; 2014 Sep; 40(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 24094867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sexually violent predator laws: psychiatry in service to a morally dubious enterprise.
    Janus ES
    Lancet; 2004 Dec; 364 Suppl 1():s50-1. PubMed ID: 15967153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Juror and expert conceptions of battered women.
    Dodge M; Greene E
    Violence Vict; 1991; 6(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 1822697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony.
    Perillo JT; Perillo AD; Despodova NM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):229-242. PubMed ID: 34351205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case.
    Krauss DA; Gongola J; Scurich N; Busch B
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):358-372. PubMed ID: 29691882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.
    First MB; Halon RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 19092060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What makes recovered-memory testimony compelling to jurors?
    Coleman BL; Stevens MJ; Reeder GD
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Aug; 25(4):317-38. PubMed ID: 11501437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.