These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25043955)

  • 1. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EEG-ERP phase dynamics of children in the auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Dec; 86(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 23046586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain dynamics in the auditory Go/NoGo task as a function of EEG frequency.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio F; Rushby JA; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Nov; 78(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 20600367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of narrow-band EEG phase effects in the passive auditory oddball task.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 24(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 16882025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG phase states at stimulus onset in a variable-ISI Go/NoGo task: Effects on ERP components.
    Barry RJ; Fogarty JS; De Blasio FM; Karamacoska D
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():89-102. PubMed ID: 29462656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related potentials in the auditory oddball as a function of EEG alpha phase at stimulus onset.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Croft RJ; Lawrence CA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 115(11):2593-601. PubMed ID: 15465449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain dynamics in the active vs. passive auditory oddball task: exploration of narrow-band EEG phase effects.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ; Wallace MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2234-47. PubMed ID: 17709297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in normal ageing: Explorations in a fixed interstimulus interval Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():87-101. PubMed ID: 32246974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prestimulus delta and theta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():40-52. PubMed ID: 29775640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evoked activity and EEG phase resetting in the genesis of auditory Go/NoGo ERPs.
    Barry RJ
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 19028546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval auditory oddball task, and their effects on ERP components.
    Barry RJ; de Pascalis V; Hodder D; Clarke AR; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Mar; 47(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 12663064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrinsic EEG and task-related changes in EEG affect Go/NoGo task performance.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ; Coleman EP; Wilson EJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Mar; 125():17-28. PubMed ID: 29409782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.