These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25044270)

  • 1. Stem compatibility for cement-in-cement femoral revision: an in vitro study.
    Berstock JR; Torrie PA; Smith JR; Webb JC; Baker RP
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 25044270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cement-within-cement femoral stem reimplantation technique].
    Judl T; Jahoda D; Landor I; Pokorný D; Melicherčík P; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):416-22. PubMed ID: 22094155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.
    te Stroet MA; Moret-Wever SG; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24970322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of stem-broach sizing on the cement mantle of Lubinus SP II stems. A CT scan analysis.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Jun; 75(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 19681321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revision total hip replacement with a cemented long femoral component: minimum 9-year follow-up results.
    So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S; Akiyama H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Jun; 133(6):869-74. PubMed ID: 23584837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture of an Exeter 'cement in cement' revision stem: a case report.
    O'Neill GK; Maheshwari R; Willis C; Meek D; Patil S
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):627-9. PubMed ID: 21948033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study.
    Okuzu Y; Goto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Nov; 21(6):810-814. PubMed ID: 27553266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exeter small femoral stem for patients with small femurs.
    Chiu KH; Cheung KW; Chung KY; Shen WY
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2011 Dec; 19(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 22184154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: A cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Oct; 76(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 16263615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a roughened femoral stem: integrity of the stem-cement interface.
    Meneghini RM; Feinberg JR; Capello WN
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 12728421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement-in-cement acetabular revision with a constrained tripolar component.
    Leonidou A; Pagkalos J; Luscombe J
    Orthopedics; 2012 Feb; 35(2):e255-8. PubMed ID: 22310415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
    Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision of polyethylene acetabular liners with a cemented polyethylene cup: a laboratory study.
    Kummer FJ; Adams MC; Dicesare PE
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Dec; 17(8):1055-7. PubMed ID: 12478518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.