These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25044860)

  • 1. A semi-automated method for measuring femoral shape to derive version and its comparison with existing methods.
    Berryman F; Pynsent P; McBryde C
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1314-25. PubMed ID: 25044860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.
    Schmaranzer F; Lerch TD; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M; Steppacher SD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 30624313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral version and neck shaft angle.
    Miller F; Merlo M; Liang Y; Kupcha P; Jamison J; Harcke HT
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1993; 13(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 8496377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Modified Ogata-Goldsand Technique for Simplified Intraoperative Measurement of Femoral Version.
    Morris WZ; Henry H; Liu RW; Streit JJ; Grant RE; Cooperman DR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015 Sep; 35(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 25379819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques.
    Cerveri P; Marchente M; Bartels W; Corten K; Simon JP; Manzotti A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1752-66. PubMed ID: 20177779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomography-based automated 3D measurement of femoral version: Validation against standard 2D measurements in symptomatic patients.
    Schmaranzer F; Movahhedi M; Singh M; Kallini JR; Nanavati AK; Steppacher SD; Heimann AF; Kiapour AM; Novais EN
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Oct; 42(10):2237-2248. PubMed ID: 38678375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femoral anteversion.
    Murphy SB; Simon SR; Kijewski PK; Wilkinson RH; Griscom NT
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Oct; 69(8):1169-76. PubMed ID: 3667647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion.
    Sugano N; Noble PC; Kamaric E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(4):610-4. PubMed ID: 9676454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of the femoral neck torsion angle-an anatomical study.
    Zhang RY; Su XY; Zhao JX; Li JT; Zhang LC; Tang PF
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 May; 15(1):192. PubMed ID: 32460899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing.
    Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA
    Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.
    Lecerf G; Fessy MH; Philippot R; Massin P; Giraud F; Flecher X; Girard J; Mertl P; Marchetti E; Stindel E
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 19423418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the Femoral CCD Angle Measurement in a Standard AP Projection Correlate with the True Anatomical Shape of the Femur?
    Heřt J; Barták V; Fulín P; Pokorný D; Sosna A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2021; 88(3):169-175. PubMed ID: 34228611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of different techniques of neck-shaft angle measurement.
    Bizdikian AJ; Assi A; Bakouny Z; Yared F; Saghbini E; Bakhos GE; Esber S; Khalil N; Otayek J; Ghanimeh J; Sauret C; Skalli W; Ghanem I
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):984.e1-984.e9. PubMed ID: 30001859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated computation of femoral angles in dogs from three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions: Comparison with manual techniques.
    Longo F; Nicetto T; Banzato T; Savio G; Drigo M; Meneghello R; Concheri G; Isola M
    Vet J; 2018 Feb; 232():6-12. PubMed ID: 29428094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Where is the neck? Alpha angle measurement revisited.
    Bouma H; Slot NJ; Toogood P; Pollard T; van Kampen P; Hogervorst T
    Acta Orthop; 2014 Apr; 85(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 24650023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Buller LT; Rosneck J; Monaco FM; Butler R; Smith T; Barsoum WK
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 22031856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of combined flexion and external rotation on measurements of the proximal femur from anteroposterior pelvic radiographs.
    O'Connor JD; Rutherford M; Hill JC; Beverland DE; Dunne NJ; Lennon AB
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Jun; 104(4):449-454. PubMed ID: 29653242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Basic concepts of femoral neck anteversion: comparison of two definitions.
    Høiseth A; Reikerås O; Fønstelien E
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):114-6. PubMed ID: 2924092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Determination of the antetorsional angle at the femur with axial computer tomography].
    Grote R; Elgeti H; Saure D
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 7355256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Discerning the femoral neck anteversion (FNA) from the torsion angle on 3D CT].
    Zhu QL; Yuan JF; Zhao LL; Wang XF
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2012 Oct; 25(10):831-3. PubMed ID: 23342798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.