700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25045857)
1. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.
Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Dandolu V; Pathak P
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Dayaratna S; Goldberg J; Harrington C; Leiby BE; McNeil JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):120.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24060444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value-based assessment of hysterectomy approaches.
Danilyants N; MacKoul P; Baxi R; van der Does LQ; Haworth LR
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):389-398. PubMed ID: 30402927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Reynisson P; Persson J
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 23603368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost evaluation, quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Ekanayake C; Pathmeswaran A; Kularatna S; Herath R; Wijesinghe P
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):565. PubMed ID: 29178955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Deimling TA; Eldridge JL; Riley KA; Kunselman AR; Harkins GJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 28099699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
