These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25045885)
1. Optimization of b-value distribution for four mathematical models of prostate cancer diffusion-weighted imaging using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2): simulation and repeatability study. Merisaari H; Jambor I Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1954-69. PubMed ID: 25045885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: a repeatability study. Jambor I; Merisaari H; Taimen P; Boström P; Minn H; Pesola M; Aronen HJ Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1988-98. PubMed ID: 25046482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis. Toivonen J; Merisaari H; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Aronen HJ; Jambor I Magn Reson Med; 2015 Oct; 74(4):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25329932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer: effect of b-value distribution on repeatability and cancer characterization. Merisaari H; Toivonen J; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Aronen HJ; Jambor I Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1212-1218. PubMed ID: 26220861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of b-value distribution for biexponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal prostate. Jambor I; Merisaari H; Aronen HJ; Järvinen J; Saunavaara J; Kauko T; Borra R; Pesola M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 39(5):1213-22. PubMed ID: 24127398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fitting methods for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of prostate cancer on region of interest level: Repeatability and gleason score prediction. Merisaari H; Movahedi P; Perez IM; Toivonen J; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Kiviniemi A; Aronen HJ; Jambor I Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1249-1264. PubMed ID: 26924552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer. Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of stretched-Exponential and monoexponential model diffusion-Weighted imaging in prostate cancer and normal tissues. Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang H; Zhang Y J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1078-85. PubMed ID: 25727776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging. Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High and ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis. Wetter A; Nensa F; Lipponer C; Guberina N; Olbricht T; Schenck M; Schlosser TW; Gratz M; Lauenstein TC Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1009-15. PubMed ID: 25168023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of computed high B value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Maas MC; Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TW Invest Radiol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):779-86. PubMed ID: 23907102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm2. Feng Z; Min X; Margolis DJ; Duan C; Chen Y; Sah VK; Chaudhary N; Li B; Ke Z; Zhang P; Wang L PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172127. PubMed ID: 28199367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer. Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference. Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion-weighted signal models in healthy and cancerous peripheral prostate tissues: comparison of outcomes obtained at different b-values. Mazzoni LN; Lucarini S; Chiti S; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Mar; 39(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 23723087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values. Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the prostate: an apparent diffusion coefficient comparison of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and echo planar imaging. Babourina-Brooks B; Cowin GJ; Wang D Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 30(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22055748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using a statistical model based on the gamma distribution. Shinmoto H; Oshio K; Tamura C; Soga S; Okamura T; Yamada K; Kaji T; Mulkern RV J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25223894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]