These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 250459)

  • 1. Staff rostering (rostering of nursing staff).
    Thompson RA
    Curationis; 1978 Jun; 1(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 250459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival kit for managers. 8. Staff appraisal and development.
    Pincus J
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Nov; 155(21):47-9. PubMed ID: 6924342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ensuring the integrity of appraisal systems.
    Shaw S
    Nurs N Z; 2000 Feb; 6(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 11040689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):26-30. PubMed ID: 3637221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ready, set, review.
    McConnell E
    Nurs Life; 1981; 1(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 6974331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluations: an important managerial skill.
    McAlvanah MF
    Pediatr Nurs; 1988; 14(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 3344162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance management.
    Pulce R
    Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(2):83. PubMed ID: 12180401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A better approach to performance reviews.
    Thomas DO
    RN; 2005 Apr; 68(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 15839081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subordinate performance appraisal: what nurses really want in their managers.
    Tayler CM
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1992; 5(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1463762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The head nurse and the difficulties of personnel evaluation].
    Lanctôt L
    Infirm Can; 1979 Jun; 21(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 255446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New graduates: what does my manager expect?
    Butts BJ; Witmer DM
    Nurs Manage; 1992 Aug; 23(8):46-8. PubMed ID: 1501835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurses' perceptions of staff appraisal.
    Goble D; Holloway I
    J Nurs Manag; 1996 Sep; 4(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 8954393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Managing the "super-achiever" nurse.
    Russell LN
    Nurs Manage; 1989 Feb; 20(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 2922164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Job satisfaction: impact of counseling and evaluation.
    Mantel ML
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Apr; 21(4):68-70, 72. PubMed ID: 2330185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurse performance: strengths and weaknesses.
    McCloskey JC; McCain B
    Nurs Res; 1988; 37(5):308-13. PubMed ID: 3419947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study in staffing.
    Daulby CN
    Australas Nurses J; 1977 Dec; 7(5):2-6. PubMed ID: 415718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive and negative criticism: strategies for professional growth.
    Davidhizar R; Wysong PR
    Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Aug; 12(6):94-9. PubMed ID: 1526162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.