These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25046133)

  • 1. Discriminating speech rhythms in audition, vision, and touch.
    Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():197-205. PubMed ID: 25046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-Modal Correspondence Among Vision, Audition, and Touch in Natural Objects: An Investigation of the Perceptual Properties of Wood.
    Kanaya S; Kariya K; Fujisaki W
    Perception; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1099-114. PubMed ID: 27257036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
    Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal frequency channels are linked across audition and touch.
    Yau JM; Olenczak JB; Dammann JF; Bensmaia SJ
    Curr Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(7):561-6. PubMed ID: 19268591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of the material properties of wood based on vision, audition, and touch.
    Fujisaki W; Tokita M; Kariya K
    Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109():185-200. PubMed ID: 25576379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision.
    Spence C; Nicholls ME; Gillespie N; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 May; 60(4):544-57. PubMed ID: 9628989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A single-band envelope cue as a supplement to speechreading of segmentals: a comparison of auditory versus tactual presentation.
    Bratakos MS; Reed CM; Delhorne LA; Denesvich G
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 11409858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods for intramodal and cross-modal investigation of rhythms (temporal patterns) in audition, vision and touch.
    Mavlov L; Dascalov I
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1981; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 7315380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to auditory-tactile colocation in early infancy.
    Thomas RL; Misra R; Akkunt E; Ho C; Spence C; Bremner AJ
    Dev Sci; 2018 Jul; 21(4):e12597. PubMed ID: 28880496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading.
    Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sound enhances touch perception.
    Ro T; Hsu J; Yasar NE; Elmore LC; Beauchamp MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 May; 195(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 19305983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.
    Convento S; Wegner-Clemens KA; Yau JM
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 31059492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Haptic and visual information speed up the neural processing of auditory speech in live dyadic interactions.
    Treille A; Cordeboeuf C; Vilain C; Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():71-7. PubMed ID: 24530236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition.
    VanRullen R; Zoefel B; Ilhan B
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2014 May; 369(1641):20130214. PubMed ID: 24639585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Hartcher-O'Brien J; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1213():111-9. PubMed ID: 18448084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction of audition and vision for the perception of prosodic contrastive focus.
    Dohen M; Loevenbruck H
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):177-206. PubMed ID: 19624029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better.
    Kim J; Sironic A; Davis C
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 22128557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.