These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25046133)

  • 21. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality.
    Wesslein AK; Frings C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Aug; 33(7):703-721. PubMed ID: 32101789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Memory for Random Time Patterns in Audition, Touch, and Vision.
    Kang H; Lancelin D; Pressnitzer D
    Neuroscience; 2018 Oct; 389():118-132. PubMed ID: 29577997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory adaptation improves tactile frequency perception.
    Crommett LE; Pérez-Bellido A; Yau JM
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1352-1362. PubMed ID: 28077668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.
    Shen G; Meltzoff AN; Marshall PJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 29038847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bridging music and speech rhythm: rhythmic priming and audio-motor training affect speech perception.
    Cason N; Astésano C; Schön D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():43-50. PubMed ID: 25553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory-tactile speech perception in congenitally blind and sighted adults.
    Sato M; Cavé C; Ménard L; Brasseur A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3683-6. PubMed ID: 20736028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inhibition of return is supramodal: a demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.
    Spence C; Lloyd D; McGlone F; Nicholls ME; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 134(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11026724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Walking to a multisensory beat.
    Roy C; Lagarde J; Dotov D; Dalla Bella S
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():172-183. PubMed ID: 28257971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When vision 'extinguishes' touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Hartcher-O'Brien J; Gallace A; Krings B; Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(4):643-58. PubMed ID: 18301885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vision of the body and the differentiation of perceived body side in touch.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1340-51. PubMed ID: 22531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multisensory integration after traumatic brain injury: a reaction time study between pairings of vision, touch and audition.
    Sarno S; Erasmus LP; Lipp B; Schlaegel W
    Brain Inj; 2003 May; 17(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 12745713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modality-switching in the Simon task: The clash of reference frames.
    Ruzzoli M; Soto-Faraco S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Oct; 146(10):1478-1497. PubMed ID: 28639796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of training on discrimination of vibrotactual speech stimuli.
    Hurley RM
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7187909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How do batters use visual, auditory, and tactile information about the success of a baseball swing?
    Gray R
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2009 Sep; 80(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 19791635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modality-specific differences in the processing of spatially, temporally, and spatiotemporally distributed information.
    Mahar D; Mackenzie B; McNicol D
    Perception; 1994; 23(11):1369-86. PubMed ID: 7761246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How Much Spatial Information Is Lost in the Sensory Substitution Process? Comparing Visual, Tactile, and Auditory Approaches.
    Richardson M; Thar J; Alvarez J; Borchers J; Ward J; Hamilton-Fletcher G
    Perception; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1079-1103. PubMed ID: 31547778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.