These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25046402)

  • 1. Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning.
    Wulf G; Chiviacowsky S; Cardozo PL
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Oct; 37():12-20. PubMed ID: 25046402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External focus and autonomy support: two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits.
    Wulf G; Chiviacowsky S; Drews R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Apr; 40():176-84. PubMed ID: 25589021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning.
    Pascua LA; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24875153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motivational effects of enhancing expectancies and autonomy for motor learning: An examination of the OPTIMAL theory.
    Ghorbani S
    J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 30654726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R; Cardozo P; Chiviacowsky S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):824-831. PubMed ID: 28056637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
    Levac D; Driscoll K; Galvez J; Mercado K; O'Neil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):129-138. PubMed ID: 29128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the continuing problem of inappropriate learning measures: Comment on Wulf et al. (2014) and Wulf et al. (2015).
    Fischman MG
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():225-31. PubMed ID: 26072360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance.
    Chua LK; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Aug; 60():107-114. PubMed ID: 29859387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning.
    Lewthwaite R; Chiviacowsky S; Drews R; Wulf G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1383-8. PubMed ID: 25732095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation.
    Grand KF; Bruzi AT; Dyke FB; Godwin MM; Leiker AM; Thompson AG; Buchanan TL; Miller MW
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Oct; 43():23-32. PubMed ID: 26163375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Autonomy Support via Instructionally Irrelevant Choice Not Beneficial for Motor Performance or Learning.
    McKay B; Ste-Marie DM
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2022 Mar; 93(1):64-76. PubMed ID: 32854605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning.
    Hooyman A; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Aug; 36():190-8. PubMed ID: 24861925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing Motor Learning in Older Adults.
    Khalaji Z; Nezakat Alhosseini M; Safavi Hamami S; Iwatsuki T; Wulf G
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2024 Jan; 79(1):. PubMed ID: 37591686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation.
    Simpson T; Cronin L; Ellison P; Carnegie E; Marchant D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Aug; 72():102651. PubMed ID: 32721370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lassoing Skill Through Learner Choice.
    Wulf G; Iwatsuki T; Machin B; Kellogg J; Copeland C; Lewthwaite R
    J Mot Behav; 2018; 50(3):285-292. PubMed ID: 28854061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Choice on Motor Learning for Learners With Different Levels of Intrinsic Motivation.
    Ikudome S; Kou K; Ogasa K; Mori S; Nakamoto H
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):159-166. PubMed ID: 31189427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a visual illusion and self-controlled practice on motor learning in children at risk for developmental coordination disorder.
    Shahbaz R; Saemi E; Doustan M; Hogg JA; Diekfuss JA
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12414. PubMed ID: 38816488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced expectancies benefit performance under distraction, but compromise it under stress: Exploring the OPTIMAL theory.
    Simmonds PJ; Wakefield CJ; Coyles G; Roberts JW
    Hum Mov Sci; 2023 Jun; 89():103085. PubMed ID: 37030071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skilled Throwing Performance: A Test of the OPTIMAL Theory.
    Sertic JVL; Avedesian JM; Navalta JW
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2021; 14(5):358-368. PubMed ID: 34055170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of autonomous difficulty selection on engagement, motivation, and learning in a motion-controlled video game task.
    Leiker AM; Bruzi AT; Miller MW; Nelson M; Wegman R; Lohse KR
    Hum Mov Sci; 2016 Oct; 49():326-35. PubMed ID: 27551820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.