These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25046448)

  • 1. Evaluating order-constrained hypotheses for circular data from a between-within subjects design.
    Baayen C; Klugkist I
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 25046448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A test of order-constrained hypotheses for circular data with applications to human movement science.
    Baayen C; Klugkist I; Mechsner F
    J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(5):351-63. PubMed ID: 22974062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating order-constrained hypotheses for circular data using permutation tests.
    Klugkist I; Bullens J; Postma A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 May; 65(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 21561442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses.
    Gu X; Mulder J; Deković M; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Dec; 19(4):511-27. PubMed ID: 25046447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses.
    Morey RD; Rouder JN
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):406-19. PubMed ID: 21787084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing.
    Stolar MH
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Nov; 37(11):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7211860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating expectations about negative emotional states of aggressive boys using Bayesian model selection.
    van de Schoot R; Hoijtink H; Mulder J; Van Aken MA; de Castro BO; Meeus W; Romeijn JW
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Jan; 47(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 21244159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Properties of hypothesis testing techniques and (Bayesian) model selection for exploration-based and theory-based (order-restricted) hypotheses.
    Kuiper RM; Nederhoff T; Klugkist I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):220-45. PubMed ID: 24975402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses using a generalization of the AIC.
    Altinisik Y; Van Lissa CJ; Hoijtink H; Oldehinkel AJ; Kuiper RM
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Oct; 26(5):599-621. PubMed ID: 34855431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables.
    Klugkist I; Laudy O; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):281-99. PubMed ID: 20822253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making reliable decisions in the study of wildlife diseases: using hypothesis tests, statistical power, and observed effects.
    O'Brien C; van Riper C; Myers DE
    J Wildl Dis; 2009 Jul; 45(3):700-12. PubMed ID: 19617480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Great challenges with few subjects: statistical strategies for neuroscientists.
    Nakagawa S; Hauber ME
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2011 Jan; 35(3):462-73. PubMed ID: 20600287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to Evaluate Theory-Based Hypotheses in Meta-Analysis Using an AIC-Type Criterion.
    Kuiper RM
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Oct; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 36359616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.