176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25047234)
1. Attribution and expression of incentive salience are differentially signaled by ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.
Brenes JC; Schwarting RK
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102414. PubMed ID: 25047234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual differences in anticipatory activity to food rewards predict cue-induced appetitive 50-kHz calls in rats.
Brenes JC; Schwarting RK
Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():107-18. PubMed ID: 25992480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in food cue responsivity are associated with acute and repeated cocaine-induced vocalizations, but not cue-induced vocalizations.
Tripi JA; Dent ML; Meyer PJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Feb; 234(3):437-446. PubMed ID: 27837333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cocaine cue is more preferred and evokes more frequency-modulated 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue.
Meyer PJ; Ma ST; Robinson TE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Feb; 219(4):999-1009. PubMed ID: 21833503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voluntary ethanol consumption changes anticipatory ultrasonic vocalizations but not novelty response.
Garcia EJ; Jorgensen ET; Sprick LS; Cain ME
Behav Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 320():186-194. PubMed ID: 27956212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.
Robinson MJ; Anselme P; Fischer AM; Berridge KC
Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():119-30. PubMed ID: 24631397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental manipulations alter age differences in attribution of incentive salience to reward-paired cues.
Anderson RI; Bush PC; Spear LP
Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():83-9. PubMed ID: 24050888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Harmonic and frequency modulated ultrasonic vocalizations reveal differences in conditioned and unconditioned reward processing.
Garcia EJ; McCowan TJ; Cain ME
Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():207-14. PubMed ID: 25827931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires greater control over motivated behavior in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue.
Yager LM; Robinson TE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Mar; 226(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 23093382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A food predictive cue must be attributed with incentive salience for it to induce c-fos mRNA expression in cortico-striatal-thalamic brain regions.
Flagel SB; Cameron CM; Pickup KN; Watson SJ; Akil H; Robinson TE
Neuroscience; 2011 Nov; 196():80-96. PubMed ID: 21945724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual variation in the attribution of incentive salience to social cues.
Fitzpatrick CJ; Morrow JD
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2583. PubMed ID: 32054901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonic vocalizations and individual differences in rats performing a Pavlovian conditioned approach task.
Sangarapillai N; Ellenberger M; Wöhr M; Schwarting RKW
Behav Brain Res; 2021 Feb; 398():112926. PubMed ID: 33049281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dopamine D1 and μ-opioid receptor antagonism blocks anticipatory 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations induced by palatable food cues in Wistar rats.
Buck CL; Vendruscolo LF; Koob GF; George O
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2014 Mar; 231(5):929-37. PubMed ID: 24221826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A neural computational model of incentive salience.
Zhang J; Berridge KC; Tindell AJ; Smith KS; Aldridge JW
PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jul; 5(7):e1000437. PubMed ID: 19609350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of subthalamic nucleus lesions on sign-tracking to stimuli paired with food and drug rewards: facilitation of incentive salience attribution?
Uslaner JM; Dell'Orco JM; Pevzner A; Robinson TE
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Sep; 33(10):2352-61. PubMed ID: 18059435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dopamine receptor blockade attenuates the general incentive motivational effects of noncontingently delivered rewards and reward-paired cues without affecting their ability to bias action selection.
Ostlund SB; Maidment NT
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2012 Jan; 37(2):508-19. PubMed ID: 21918507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cue-induced reinstatement of food seeking in rats that differ in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to food cues.
Yager LM; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 214(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 20416342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anticipatory 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations are associated with escalated alcohol intake in dependent rats.
Buck CL; Malavar JC; George O; Koob GF; Vendruscolo LF
Behav Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 271():171-6. PubMed ID: 24914463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The habenula governs the attribution of incentive salience to reward predictive cues.
Danna CL; Shepard PD; Elmer GI
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():781. PubMed ID: 24368898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.
Flagel SB; Akil H; Robinson TE
Neuropharmacology; 2009; 56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):139-48. PubMed ID: 18619474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
