217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25047472)
1. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery(SM) database.
Landercasper J; Whitacre E; Degnim AC; Al-Hamadani M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3185-91. PubMed ID: 25047472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reexcision Surgery for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery
Schulman AM; Mirrielees JA; Leverson G; Landercasper J; Greenberg C; Wilke LG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 27581607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.
Boughey JC; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Grant CS; Farley DR; Thomsen KM; Osborn JB; Keeney GL; Habermann EB
Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 24929768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discordance between pathologic and radiologic tumor size on breast MRI may contribute to increased re-excision rates.
Vanderwalde LH; Dang CM; Bresee C; Phillips EH
Am Surg; 2011 Oct; 77(10):1361-3. PubMed ID: 22127089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma.
Gupta A; Subhas G; Dubay L; Silapaswan S; Kolachalam R; Kestenberg W; Ferguson L; Jacobs MJ; Gorieil Y; Mittal VK
Am Surg; 2010 Jul; 76(7):731-4. PubMed ID: 20698380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in Reoperation After Initial Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Addressing Overtreatment in Surgical Management.
Morrow M; Abrahamse P; Hofer TP; Ward KC; Hamilton AS; Kurian AW; Katz SJ; Jagsi R
JAMA Oncol; 2017 Oct; 3(10):1352-1357. PubMed ID: 28586788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive or close margins in breast conserving surgery: is re-excision always necessary?
Gurdal SO; Karanlik H; Cabioglu N; Ozcinar B; Yavuz E; Tuzlali S; Ozmen V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 22440741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Separate cavity margins excision as a complement to conservative breast cancer surgery.
Zavagno G; Donà M; Orvieto E; Mocellin S; Pasquali S; Goldin E; Mele ML; Belardinelli V; Nitti D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 20542659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Margin width is not predictive of residual disease on re-excision in breast conserving therapy.
Hadzikadic Gusic L; McGuire KP; Ozmen T; Soran A; Thomas CR; McAuliffe PF; Diego EJ; Bonaventura M; Johnson RR; Ahrendt GM
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 109(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 24338603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Margin width should not still enforce a systematic surgical re-excision in the conservative treatment of early breast infiltrative ductal carcinoma.
Jaffré I; Campion L; Dejode M; Bordes V; Sagan C; Loussouarn D; Dravet F; Andrieux N; Classe JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 20(12):3831-8. PubMed ID: 23838905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rates of residual disease with close but negative margins in breast cancer surgery.
Garvey EM; Senior DA; Pockaj BA; Wasif N; Dueck AC; McCullough AE; Ocal IT; Gray RJ
Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 25845608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members.
Landercasper J; Borgert AJ; Fayanju OM; Cody H; Feldman S; Greenberg C; Linebarger J; Pockaj B; Wilke L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3321-3336. PubMed ID: 31342360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of intraoperative specimen inking on lumpectomy re-excision rates.
Singh M; Singh G; Hogan KT; Atkins KA; Schroen AT
World J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 8():4. PubMed ID: 20082705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
