217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25047472)
21. Cost-effectiveness of surgeon performed intraoperative specimen ink in breast conservation surgery.
Van Den Bruele AB; Jasra B; Smotherman C; Crandall M; Samiian L
J Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 231():441-447. PubMed ID: 30278966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
Obedian E; Haffty BG
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: A cost analysis using a decision tree model.
Abe SE; Hill JS; Han Y; Walsh K; Symanowski JT; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Flippo-Morton T; Sarantou T; Forster M; White RL
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 112(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 26374088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.
Atalay C; Irkkan C
Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do All Positive Margins in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing a Partial Mastectomy Need to Be Resected?
Chagpar AB; Tsangaris TN; Lannin DR
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29524664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk of local failure in breast cancer patients with lobular carcinoma in situ at the final surgical margins: is re-excision necessary?
Sadek BT; Shenouda MN; Abi Raad RF; Niemierko A; Keruakous AR; Goldberg SI; Taghian AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):726-30. PubMed ID: 24064317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on the short-term outcomes in breast cancer.
Zork NM; Komenaka IK; Pennington RE; Bowling MW; Norton LE; Clare SE; Goulet RJ
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 18650639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Re-excision of margins before breast radiation-diagnostic or therapeutic?
Chism DB; Freedman GM; Li T; Anderson PR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Aug; 65(5):1416-21. PubMed ID: 16730133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients.
Menes TS; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss I; Godbold JH; Estabrook A; Smith SR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):881-5. PubMed ID: 16195834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lumpectomy specimen margins are not reliable in predicting residual disease in breast conserving surgery.
Tang R; Coopey SB; Specht MC; Lei L; Gadd MA; Hughes KS; Brachtel EF; Smith BL
Am J Surg; 2015 Jul; 210(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25613784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Indication for relumpectomy--a useful scoring system in cases of invasive breast cancer.
Halevy A; Lavy R; Pappo I; Davidson T; Gold-Deutch R; Jeroukhimov I; Shapira Z; Wassermann I; Sandbank J; Chikman B
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 105(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 21780127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors associated with residual disease after initial breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Wei S; Kragel CP; Zhang K; Hameed O
Hum Pathol; 2012 Jul; 43(7):986-93. PubMed ID: 22221704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast surgery techniques: preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons.
Burkholder HC; Witherspoon LE; Burns RP; Horn JS; Biderman MD
Am Surg; 2007 Jun; 73(6):574-8; discussion 578-9. PubMed ID: 17658094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: is re-excision required?
Mullen R; Macaskill EJ; Khalil A; Elseedawy E; Brown DC; Lee AC; Purdie CA; Jordan LB; Thompson AM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 22285907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
