BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25047707)

  • 1. Systematically defining single-gene determinants of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveals specific biomarkers.
    Witkiewicz AK; Balaji U; Knudsen ES
    Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Sep; 20(18):4837-48. PubMed ID: 25047707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HER2 immunohistochemistry staining positivity is strongly predictive of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 positive breast cancer.
    Zhao J; Krishnamurti U; Zhang C; Meisel J; Wei Z; Suo A; Aneja R; Li Z; Li X
    Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153155. PubMed ID: 32871536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MET and PTEN gene copy numbers and Ki-67 protein expression associate with pathologic complete response in ERBB2-positive breast carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy.
    Calhoun BC; Portier B; Wang Z; Minca EC; Budd GT; Lanigan C; Tubbs RR; Morrison LE
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Aug; 16(1):695. PubMed ID: 27576528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A gene expression signature of Retinoblastoma loss-of-function predicts resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer patients.
    Risi E; Grilli A; Migliaccio I; Biagioni C; McCartney A; Guarducci C; Bonechi M; Benelli M; Vitale S; Biganzoli L; Bicciato S; Di Leo A; Malorni L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):329-341. PubMed ID: 29564743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinicopathologic Factors Associated With Response to Neoadjuvant Anti-HER2-Directed Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.
    Meisel JL; Zhao J; Suo A; Zhang C; Wei Z; Taylor C; Aneja R; Krishnamurti U; Li Z; Nahta R; O'Regan R; Li X
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 31806448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serum Tumor Marker Levels might have Little Significance in Evaluating Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Wang YJ; Huang XY; Mo M; Li JW; Jia XQ; Shao ZM; Shen ZZ; Wu J; Liu GY
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(11):4603-8. PubMed ID: 26107211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene pathways associated with prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity in molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
    Iwamoto T; Bianchini G; Booser D; Qi Y; Coutant C; Shiang CY; Santarpia L; Matsuoka J; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Holmes FA; O'Shaughnessy J; Hellerstedt B; Pippen J; Andre F; Simon R; Pusztai L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Feb; 103(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 21191116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FOXA1 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic marker in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Kawase M; Toyama T; Takahashi S; Sato S; Yoshimoto N; Endo Y; Asano T; Kobayashi S; Fujii Y; Yamashita H
    Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):308-16. PubMed ID: 23771556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ki-67 as a controversial predictive and prognostic marker in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Ács B; Zámbó V; Vízkeleti L; Szász AM; Madaras L; Szentmártoni G; Tőkés T; Molnár BÁ; Molnár IA; Vári-Kakas S; Kulka J; Tőkés AM
    Diagn Pathol; 2017 Feb; 12(1):20. PubMed ID: 28222768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subtype-Specific Metagene-Based Prediction of Outcome after Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer.
    Callari M; Cappelletti V; D'Aiuto F; Musella V; Lembo A; Petel F; Karn T; Iwamoto T; Provero P; Daidone MG; Gianni L; Bianchini G
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Jan; 22(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 26423797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with PCR for assessment of ER, PR, and Ki-67 and prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer.
    Sinn HP; Schneeweiss A; Keller M; Schlombs K; Laible M; Seitz J; Lakis S; Veltrup E; Altevogt P; Eidt S; Wirtz RM; Marmé F
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28193205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic and Expression Analyses Define MUC17 and PCNX1 as Predictors of Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer.
    Al Amri WS; Allinson LM; Baxter DE; Bell SM; Hanby AM; Jones SJ; Shaaban AM; Stead LF; Verghese ET; Hughes TA
    Mol Cancer Ther; 2020 Mar; 19(3):945-955. PubMed ID: 31879365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PAM50 for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ER-positive breast cancer.
    Ohara AM; Naoi Y; Shimazu K; Kagara N; Shimoda M; Tanei T; Miyake T; Kim SJ; Noguchi S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Feb; 173(3):533-543. PubMed ID: 30361874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High expression of class III β-tubulin predicts good response to neoadjuvant taxane and doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.
    Wang Y; Sparano JA; Fineberg S; Stead L; Sunkara J; Horwitz SB; McDaid HM
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 13(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 23218766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic grade index is associated with response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
    Liedtke C; Hatzis C; Symmans WF; Desmedt C; Haibe-Kains B; Valero V; Kuerer H; Hortobagyi GN; Piccart-Gebhart M; Sotiriou C; Pusztai L
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jul; 27(19):3185-91. PubMed ID: 19364972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on pathologic complete response in very young patients with ER-positive breast cancer: a large, multicenter, observational study.
    Woo J; Oh SJ; Song JY; Chae BJ; Choi JE; Lee J; Park HK; ; Lim W
    BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):647. PubMed ID: 34059020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase II trial of eribulin in patients who do not achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Yardley DA; Peacock N; Daniel B; Anz B; Molthrop DC; Shroff SK; Young R; Jankov A; Vander Woude A; Shastry M; Pasek J; DeBusk LM; Hainsworth JD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 180(3):647-655. PubMed ID: 32060783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive significance of DNA damage and repair biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: An exploratory analysis.
    Vici P; Di Benedetto A; Ercolani C; Pizzuti L; Di Lauro L; Sergi D; Sperati F; Terrenato I; Dattilo R; Botti C; Fabi A; Ramieri MT; Mentuccia L; Marinelli C; Iezzi L; Gamucci T; Natoli C; Vitale I; Barba M; Mottolese M; De Maria R; Maugeri-Saccà M
    Oncotarget; 2015 Dec; 6(40):42773-80. PubMed ID: 26544894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of pathologic complete response and Ki67 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Yoshioka T; Hosoda M; Yamamoto M; Taguchi K; Hatanaka KC; Takakuwa E; Hatanaka Y; Matsuno Y; Yamashita H
    Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 23645542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative digital imaging analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry predicts the response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast carcinoma.
    Li AC; Zhao J; Zhao C; Ma Z; Hartage R; Zhang Y; Li X; Parwani AV
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 180(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 32002765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.