BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25048048)

  • 1. Comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia between hybrid fixation and conventional fixation following sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Moroi A; Ishihara Y; Sotobori M; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Yoshizawa K; Marukawa K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1808-12. PubMed ID: 25048048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of factors affecting recovery period in lower lip hypoesthesia after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients.
    Ueki K; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Moroi A; Yoshizawa K; Marukawa K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1748-52. PubMed ID: 25033740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of bone healing and hypoesthesia in the upper lip after Le Fort I osteotomy with self-setting α-tricalcium phosphate and absorbable plates.
    Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K; Kawashiri S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22819299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of self-setting α-tricalcium phosphate between segments for bone healing and hypoaesthesia in lower lip after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 40(4):e119-24. PubMed ID: 21843948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia measured by trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential between different types of mandibular osteotomies and fixation.
    Hashiba Y; Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Shimizu C; Alam S; Nakagawa K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 17448708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between recovery period of lower lip hypoesthesia and sagittal split area or plate screw position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Hashiba Y; Ueki K; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E; Matsubara K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jan; 105(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17764990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.
    Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of overlapped cortical bone area after modified plate fixation with bent plate in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Nakano Y; Higuchi M; Nakazawa R; Ikawa H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e210-6. PubMed ID: 24095217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy among mono-cortical plate fixation, bi-cortical plate fixation, and hybrid fixation using absorbable plates and screws.
    Ueki K; Moroi A; Yoshizawa K; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):178-182. PubMed ID: 28011183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Somatosensory-evoked potential to evaluate the trigeminal nerve after sagittal split osteotomy.
    Nakagawa K; Ueki K; Takatsuka S; Takazakura D; Yamamoto E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 11174589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials.
    Ueki K; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Ikawa H; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Saida Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):710-6. PubMed ID: 25887426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of upper lip hypoesthesia with a trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential following Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with mandibular osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Hashiba Y; Shimizu C; Yamamoto E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 17234530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of postoperative hypoesthesia between two types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential method.
    Takazakura D; Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Shamiul A; Yamamoto E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17141470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified hybrid fixation using absorbable plate and screw for mandibular advancement surgery.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Baba N; Sato M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1788-1793. PubMed ID: 28927955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparisons among unsintered hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactic acid plate, poly-L-lactic acid plate, and titanium plate.
    Ueki K; Okabe K; Miyazaki M; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1464-8. PubMed ID: 21216071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the computed tomography (pixel) value of mandibular ramus bone and fixation screws after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Moroi A; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Yoshizawa K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1337-45. PubMed ID: 26139563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evaluation of surgical factors related to recovery period of upper lip hypoaesthesia after Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Alam S; Yamamoto E
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 36(7):390-4. PubMed ID: 18486484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
    Oh JS; Kim SG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The stability of mandibular prognathism corrected by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: a comparison of bi-cortical osteosynthesis and mono-cortical osteosynthesis.
    Hsu SS; Huang CS; Chen PK; Ko EW; Chen YR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 22129998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.