These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25048250)
1. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Opdam NJ; van de Sande FH; Bronkhorst E; Cenci MS; Bottenberg P; Pallesen U; Gaengler P; Lindberg A; Huysmans MC; van Dijken JW J Dent Res; 2014 Oct; 93(10):943-9. PubMed ID: 25048250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caries risk and number of restored surfaces have impact on the survival of posterior composite restorations. Balevi B Evid Based Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):118-9. PubMed ID: 25522946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial. Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic. Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base. van de Sande FH; Rodolpho PA; Basso GR; Patias R; da Rosa QF; Demarco FF; Opdam NJ; Cenci MS Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 25863523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study. Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites. van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study. Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort. Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. Heintze SD; Rousson V J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):407-31. PubMed ID: 23082310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA J Adhes Dent; 2007 Oct; 9(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 18297828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Hickel R; Manhart J J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite. van Dijken JW; Lindberg A Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up. van Dijken JW; Pallesen U Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 19504133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations. Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. van Dijken JW; Pallesen U J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 25516885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]