These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25048250)

  • 21. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Gordan VV; Litaker MS; Funkhouser E; Fellows JL; Shamp DG; Qvist V; Meral JS; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jun; 144(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 23729455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
    Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2015 May; 31(5):481-95. PubMed ID: 25773188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries.
    Kuper NK; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 22226997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure.
    Kopperud SE; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Dec; 120(6):539-48. PubMed ID: 23167471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
    Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials.
    Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Montagner AF; de Lima VP; Correa MB; Moraes RR; Opdam NJM
    Dent Mater; 2023 Jan; 39(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 36494241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effectiveness of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner in reducing hypersensitivity in posterior restorations: a study from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning network.
    Strober B; Veitz-Keenan A; Barna JA; Matthews AG; Vena D; Craig RG; Curro FA; Thompson VP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Aug; 144(8):886-97. PubMed ID: 23904575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.