These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25048250)

  • 41. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [A PhD completed 5. Restoration survival in the composite resin age].
    van de Sande FH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2016 Sep; 123(9):429-31. PubMed ID: 27643497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
    Demarco FF; Collares K; Correa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 Aug; 31(suppl 1):e56. PubMed ID: 28902236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
    Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.
    Demarco FF; Corrêa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 22192253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.
    Stefanski S; van Dijken JW
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 21104100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Direct materials for restoring caries lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis-a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
    Pilcher L; Pahlke S; Urquhart O; O'Brien KK; Dhar V; Fontana M; González-Cabezas C; Keels MA; Mascarenhas AK; Nascimento MM; Platt JA; Sabino GJ; Slayton RL; Tinanoff N; Young DA; Zero DT; Tampi MP; Purnell D; Salazar J; Megremis S; Bienek D; Carrasco-Labra A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Feb; 154(2):e1-e98. PubMed ID: 36610925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
    Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Longevity of posterior composite restorations in children suffering from early childhood caries-results from a retrospective study.
    Bayram M; Akgöl BB; Üstün N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2867-2876. PubMed ID: 33009626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Apr; 62(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 15198387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effectiveness of adhesive containing MDPB: A practice-based clinical trial.
    Hollanders ACC; Kuper NK; Bronkhorst EM; Laske M; Huysmans MCDNJM
    Dent Mater; 2023 Aug; 39(8):756. PubMed ID: 37394389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.
    Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Barbosa SH; Lauris JR; Franco EB
    J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 14682645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.